[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
AI::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
:: Volume 29, Issue 7 (Special Issue 2025) ::
Feyz Med Sci J 2025, 29(7): 758-764 Back to browse issues page
Management of adverse blood transfusion reactions for integrating clinical decision support systems with electronic health records: A policy brief
Mahdie ShojaeiBaghini1 , Mohammad Mehdi Ghaemi , Alihasan Ahmadipour *
Faculty of Medical Informatics Management, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , alihasanahmadipour@gmail.com
Abstract:   (222 Views)
One of the effective tools for identifying and preventing adverse transfusion reactions is the integration of clinical decision support systems with electronic health records. Although existing research in the field of hemovigilance highlights the potential value of these systems, challenges within policy and governance frameworks may hinder their effective integration and optimal use within electronic health records for managing Adverse Transfusion Reactions. The analysis presented in this policy brief is based on evidence derived from a systematic review conducted in 2025. Based on the collected data, nine key challenges related to the integration of these systems with electronic health records were identified, along with corresponding policy recommendations and the identification of relevant policymakers. To address these challenges, the development of a comprehensive national governance framework and the design of a long-term roadmap for integrating electronic health records with artificial intelligence based clinical decision support systems are recommended as priority actions.
Keywords: Adverse Transfusion Reactions, Hemovigilance, Clinical Decision Support System, Electronic Health Record, Policy Brief
Full-Text [PDF 368 kb]   (26 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Policy Brief | Subject: medicine, paraclinic
Received: 2025/11/19 | Revised: 2026/04/8 | Accepted: 2026/01/5 | Published: 2026/03/15
References
1. Nagendran M, Chen Y, Lovejoy CA, Gordon AC, Komorowski M, Harvey H, et al. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. BMJ. 2020; 368. doi.10.1136/bmj.m689 PMid:32213531 PMCid:PMC7190037
2. Stipelman CH, Kukhareva PV, Trepman E, Nguyen QT, Valdez L, Kenost C, et al. Electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support for clinicians serving populations facing health care disparities: literature review. Yearb Med Inform. 2022; 31(01):184-98. doi.10.1055/s-0042-1742518 PMid:36463877 PMCid:PMC9719761
3. Shawahna R. Merits, features, and desiderata to be considered when developing electronic health records with embedded clinical decision support systems in Palestinian hospitals: a consensus study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019; 19(1):216. doi.10.1186/s12911-019-0928-3 PMid:31703675 PMCid:PMC6842153
4. ShojaeiBaghini M, Ghaemi MM, Ahmadipour A. Artificial intelligence in the identification and prediction of adverse transfusion reactions(ATRs) and implications for clinical management: a systematic review of models and applications. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025;25(1):396. doi.10.1186/s12911-025-03232-z PMid:41152861 PMCid:PMC12560389
5. Sounderajah V, Ashrafian H, Rose S, Shah NH, Ghassemi M, Golub R, et al. A Quality Assessment Tool for Artificial Intelligence-Centered Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: Quadas-Ai. Nature Med. 2021; 27(10):1663-5. doi.10.1038/s41591-021-01517-0 PMid:34635854
6. Smith H. Clinical AI: opacity, accountability, responsibility and liability. Ai & Society. 2021; 36(2): 535-45. doi.10.1007/s00146-020-01019-6
7. Gharib M, Bondavalli A, editors. On the evaluation measures for machine learning algorithms for safety-critical systems. 2019 15th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC); 2019: IEEE. doi.10.1109/EDCC.2019.00035
8. Marcilly R, Colliaux J, Payen A, Beuscart J-B. Considering work systems and processes in assessing the impact of a CDSS intervention: preliminary results. Context Sensitive Health Informatics and the Pandemic Boost: IOS Press; 2023. p. 52-6. doi.10.3233/SHTI230368
9. Oyeniran C, Adewusi AO, Adeleke AG, Akwawa LA, Azubuko CF. Ethical AI: Addressing bias in machine learning models and software applications. Computer Sci IT Res J. 2022; 3(3):115-26. doi.10.51594/csitrj.v3i3.1559
10. Mukhiya SK, Lamo Y. An HL7 FHIR and GraphQL approach for interoperability between heterogeneous Electronic Health Record systems. Health Inform J. 2021; 27(3): 14604582211043920. doi.10.1177/14604582211043920 PMid:34524029
11. Schöning J, Kruse N. Compliance of AI Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:250305571. 2025.
12. Muhiyaddin R, Abd-Alrazaq AA, Househ M, Alam T, Shah Z. The impact of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on physicians: a scoping review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020:470-3. doi.10.3233/SHTI200597
13. Newton N, Bamgboje-Ayodele A, Forsyth R, Tariq A, Baysari MT. How are clinicians' acceptance and use of clinical decision support systems evaluated over time? A systematic review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024; 259-63. doi.10.3233/SHTI230967
14. Mammen JJ, Asirvatham ES, Sarman CJ, Ranjan V, Charles B. A review of legal, regulatory, and policy aspects of blood transfusion services in India: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2021; 15(2):204-11. doi.10.4103/ajts.AJTS_65_20 PMid:34908756 PMCid:PMC8628249
15. Aliabad MB. Examination of Electronic Health Records in Iran: Legal Requirements and Implementation Challenges. 2022.
16. Nader M, Haleh A, Hamid H. Examining the Barriers to the Creation and Implementation of Electronic Health Records in Iran. 2013.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

Ethics code: 777777



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

ShojaeiBaghini1 M, Ghaemi M M, Ahmadipour A. Management of adverse blood transfusion reactions for integrating clinical decision support systems with electronic health records: A policy brief. Feyz Med Sci J 2025; 29 (7) :758-764
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-5441-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 29, Issue 7 (Special Issue 2025) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.12 seconds with 46 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741