[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
AI::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
metrics
Journal volumes: 30
Journal issues: 154
Articles views: 20438426
Articles downloads: 7129420

Total authors: 7783
Unique authors: 5402
Repeated authors: 2381
Repeated authors percent: 31

Submitted articles: 5101
Accepted articles: 2179
Rejected articles: 2844
Published articles: 2070

Acceptance rate: 42.72
Rejection rate: 55.75

Average Time to Accept: 194 days
Average Time to First Review: 15.3 days
Average Time to Publish: 42.9 days

Last 3 years statistics:
Submitted articles: 617
Accepted articles: 203
Rejected articles: 340
Published articles: 203

Acceptance rate: 32.9
Rejection rate: 55.11

Average Time to Accept: 106 days
Average Time to First Review: 10.8 days
Average Time to Publish: 42.9 days
____
..
:: Volume 8, Issue 3 (Quarterly 2004) ::
Feyz Med Sci J 2004, 8(3): 1-6 Back to browse issues page
Role of brace in lumbar instable fracture after fixation with pedicular screw
Sayed Ali Modarres Zamani * , Giv Sharifi , Ramin Kamali
Abstract:   (11780 Views)

Background : Lumbar and thoracolumbar fractures are among the most common fractures of spine. Some instable fractures require fixation and TLSO brace. Nowadays, pedicular screw are more commonly applied for rapid fixation and bone fusion, thus, it seems as if brace may be used less commonly. The present study was performed to determine the role of brace in lumbar instable fracture after fixation with pedicular screw in Loghman hospital.

Materials and methods : For this clinical trial patients were assigned in 2 groups of with and without brace. Radiologic and clinical examination data of 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery were used to determine bone fusion. Chi square and Fisher's exact test were used for data analysis.

Results : Of 56 cases with thoracolumbar fracture, 48 were fixated with pedicular screw. Falling was the most common etiology, L1 was the most common affected vertebra, and burst was the most common fracture type. Groups were similar according to demographic features. Fusion rate was 60% with brace and 58% without brace in a 3-month follow up however, it was 100% in both groups after one year. Residual back pain did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion : Brace did not influence the outcomes. Thus, patients with instable thoracolumbar fracture may not require TLSO brace following the pedicular screw surgery.

Keywords: Thoracolumbar fracture, TLSO brace, Pedicular screw, Fixation
Full-Text [PDF 166 kb]   (3735 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2008/11/4 | Published: 2004/10/15
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Modarres Zamani S A, Sharifi G, Kamali R. Role of brace in lumbar instable fracture after fixation with pedicular screw. Feyz Med Sci J 2004; 8 (3) :1-6
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-246-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 8, Issue 3 (Quarterly 2004) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.12 seconds with 48 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774