1. Cacciottola L, Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Ovarian tissue damage after grafting: systematic review of strategies to improve follicle outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(3):351-369. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.06.019 PMid:34384692

2. Lakshmanan M, Saini M, Nune M. Exploring the innovative application of cerium oxide nanoparticles for addressing oxidative stress in ovarian tissue regeneration. J Ovarian Res. 2024;17(1):241. doi:10.1186/s13048-024-01566-2 PMid:39633503 PMCid:PMC11619646

3. Guo H, Yang T, Xia C, Ni Z, Lou Y, et al. Glutathione selenium nanoparticles alleviate oxidative stress-induced reproductive dysfunction by regulating mitochondrial dynamics. Free Radic Biol Med. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2025.10.277

4. Shalaby OE, Ahmed YH, Mekkawy AM, Mahmoud MY, Elbargeesy GA. The ameliorative effect of selenium-loaded chitosan nanoparticles against silver nanoparticles-induced ovarian toxicity in female albino rats. J Ovarian Res. 2025;18(1):4. doi:10.1186/s13048-024-01577-z PMid:39773284 PMCid:PMC11706040

5. Zhang D, Wang L, Tian L, Chen W, El-kott AF, et al. Bio-inspired deposition of gold nanoparticles onto the surface of kaolin for in vitro management of human ovarian cancer and modulation of the inflammatory response in adenomyosis-induced mice in vivo via the MAPK signaling pathway. J Sci Adv Mater Dev. 2024;9(2):100714. doi:10.1016/j.jsamd.2024.100714

6. Brohi RD, Wang L, Talpur HS, Wu D, Khan FA, et al. Toxicity of nanoparticles on the reproductive system in animal models: a review. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:606. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00606 PMid:28928662 PMCid:PMC5591883

7. Samrot AV, Noel Richard Prakash LX. Nanoparticles induced oxidative damage in reproductive system and role of antioxidants on the induced toxicity. Life. 2023;13(3):767. doi:10.3390/life13030767 PMid:36983922 PMCid:PMC10059981

8. Hua S, De Matos MB, Metselaar JM, Storm G. Current trends and challenges in the clinical translation of nanoparticulate nanomedicines: pathways for translational development and commercialization. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:790. doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00790 PMid:30065653 PMCid:PMC6056679

9. Uğur H, Pabuccuoğlu SK, Pabuccuoğlu S. The basic principles of cryopreservation and the importance of polyampholytes as a cryoprotectant. J Istanbul Vet Sci. 2025;9(1):47-56. doi:10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.1674387

10. Eberhart S, Khalifa H, Rafensteiner L, Lehner J, Hancke K, et al. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue-what's known so far and future perspectives. Front Reprod Health. 2026;8:1768400. doi:10.3389/frph.2026.1768400 PMid:41987942 PMCid:PMC13076554

11. Rionda M. Engineering Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogels to Facilitate Ovarian Tissue Transplantation [doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan.

12. Brunette MA, Kinnear HM, Hashim PH, Flanagan CL, Day JR, et al. Human ovarian follicles xenografted in immunoisolating capsules survive long term implantation in mice. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:886678. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.886678 PMid:35721740 PMCid:PMC9205207

13. Rajan R, Hayashi F, Nagashima T, Matsumura K. Toward a molecular understanding of the mechanism of cryopreservation by polyampholytes: cell membrane interactions and hydrophobicity. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(5):1882-93. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00343 PMid:27077533

14. Stubbs C, Bailey TL, Murray K, Gibson MI. Polyampholytes as emerging macromolecular cryoprotectants. Biomacromolecules. 2019;21(1):7-17. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01053 PMid:31418266 PMCid:PMC6960013

15. Delesky EA, Srubar WV. Ice-binding proteins and bioinspired synthetic mimics in non-physiological environments. iScience. 2022;25(5). doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104286 PMid:35573196 PMCid:PMC9097698

16. Kong HS, Hong YH, Lee J, Youm HW, Lee JR, et al. Antifreeze protein supplementation during the warming of vitrified bovine ovarian tissue can improve the ovarian tissue quality after xenotransplantation. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:672619. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.672619 PMid:34122348 PMCid:PMC8194858

17. Jiang M, Zhang GH, Yu Y, Zhao YH, Liu J, et al. De novo design of a nanoregulator for the dynamic restoration of ovarian tissue in cryopreservation and transplantation. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):330. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02602-5

18. Nam Y, Nguyen DL, Hoang T, Kim B, Lee JH, et al. Engineered ice-binding protein (Ff IBP) shows increased stability and resistance to thermal and chemical denaturation compared to the wildtype. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3234. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53864-w PMid:38331970 PMCid:PMC10853241

19. Correia LF, Rocha NO, Lessa GP, Braga RF, Souza-Fabjan JM. Role of antifreeze protein type I in feline ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2024;37(1). doi:10.1071/RDv37n1Ab39

20. Shen F, Jiang X, Zhu AB, Yang H, Zhang X, et al. Development of low-immunogenic AFPs for cell cryopreservation by hydrophilic modification. Langmuir. 2025;41(30):20154-60. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c02398 PMid:40694604

21. Zhang X, Qi H, Yang J, Chen X, Zhang L. Development of low immunogenic antifreeze peptides for cryopreservation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2023;62(31):12063-72. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01054

22. Aminian S, Mazoochi T, Hosseini ES, Jamalzaei P, Taheri MA. Protective effect of bio-scaffold against vitrification damage in mouse ovarian tissue. Reprod Sci. 2024;31(11):3512-20. doi:10.1007/s43032-024-01680-y PMid:39210236

23. Sobhani K, Farzinpour A, Amorim C, Amidi F. Alginate Biomimetic Hydrogel: A Novel Matrix for the Preservation of Encapsulated Ovarian Tissue in an Animal Model. IJOGI. 2025;28(10):36-48.

24. Wu T, Huang KC, Yan JF, Zhang JJ, Wang SX. Extracellular matrix-derived scaffolds in constructing artificial ovaries for ovarian failure: a systematic methodological review. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(2):hoad014. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoad014 PMid:37180603 PMCid:PMC10174707

25. Nikhila SK, Menon SS, Vanishree VM, Kalthur G, Kalthur SG, et al. development of a biomimetic 3d ovarian scaffold using decellularized extracellular matrix and mechanically tuned hydrogels. bioRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.03.07.709996

26. van Hengel EVA, Drabek D, Roest HP, Willemse J, Reniers LJ, et al. Removal of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses in Decellularized Liver Bioscaffolds. Xenotransplantation. 2025;32(6):e70097. doi:10.1111/xen.70097 PMid:41293918 PMCid:PMC12679514

27. Romero DJ, Hussey G, Capella-Monsonís H. Immune response to extracellular matrix bioscaffolds: A comprehensive review. Biologics. 2025;5(3):28. doi:10.3390/biologics5030028

28. Sako Y, Shioda K, Akitani F, Kikuchi I, Kitano T, et al. First live births after non-fixation cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation in Japan. Climacteric. 2026;29(1):129-33. doi:10.1080/13697137.2025.2579658 PMid:41358628

29. Kong Q, Pei C, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Isachenko V. Comparison of the quality of ovarian tissue cryopreservation by conventional slow cryopreservation and vitrification-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2025;18(1):62. doi:10.1186/s13048-024-01561-7 PMid:40140886 PMCid:PMC11948982

30. Le TM, Tran TH, Pham VP, Dang TL, Duong KT, et al. The first comparative study on the effectiveness of slow freezing and vitrification of human ovarian tissue by xenotransplantation model in Vietnam. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025;42(5):1473-84. doi:10.1007/s10815-025-03439-z PMid:40029565 PMCid:PMC12167403

31. Zhang Y, Horta F, Beilby K, Catt S, Pangestu M. Viability of ovarian tissue after cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification in sheep. Cryobiology. 2026;122:105591. doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2026.105591 PMid:41691733

32. Behl S, Joshi VB, Larson NB, Young MC, Bilal M, et al. Vitrification versus slow freezing of human ovarian tissue: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(3):455-64. doi:10.1007/s10815-022-02692-w PMid:36542310 PMCid:PMC10033773