[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
:: Volume 26, Issue 2 (Bimonthly 2022) ::
Feyz 2022, 26(2): 228-239 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of cytogenetic biomarkers in occupationally exposures of medical radiation-workers to low doses of ionizing radiation: A review article
Seyedeh Nasibeh Mousavikia , Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni-Toossi , Sara Khademi , Hosein Azimian
Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, I.R. Iran. , azimianh@mums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1323 Views)
Background: Ionizing radiation plays an important role in medical diagnosis and treatment. However, it may have adverse effects on human health. Adherence to the principles of protection against ionizing radiation can be effective in reducing these adverse effects. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate different researches related to the effect of occupational radiation from low doses of ionizing radiation in medical staff by using two standard cytogenetic biomarkers.
Material and Methods: In this study, a summary of recent studies on medical exposure who are occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation is presented. In the following, the results of these articles and confounding factors are discussed.
Results: The most of studies stated that chronic exposures of low doses of ionizing radiation increases chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus frequency in medical exposure compared to the control group. However, there are some conflicting results that need to be considered. On the other hand, in addition to the cumulative dose and years of employment, other various factors such as age, sex, smoking or even special diets can also affect these injuries.
Conclusion: Due to the use of ionizing radiation in the medical field, the protection of medical exposures is important and serious. Therefore, it seems that continuous biological monitoring along with standard protocols for radiation protection is essential.
Keywords: Occupational exposure, Ionizing radiation, Chronic low dose, Cytogenetic biomarkers
Full-Text [PDF 436 kb]   (1474 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review | Subject: medicine, paraclinic
Received: 2021/10/12 | Revised: 2022/06/6 | Accepted: 2022/04/20 | Published: 2022/05/30
References
1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37(2-4): 1-332.
2. Wall BF, Kendall GM, Edwards AA, Bouffler S, Muirhead CR, Meara JR. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation? Br J Radiol 2006; 79(940): 285-94.
3. Little MP, Tawn EJ, Tzoulaki I, Wakeford R, Hildebrandt G, Paris F, et al. A systematic review of epidemiological associations between low and moderate doses of ionizing radiation and late cardiovascular effects, and their possible mechanisms. Radiat Res 2008; 169(1): 99-109.
4. Toossi MB, Azimian H, Rezaei A, Rafatpanah H, Hamzehloei T, Fardid R. Low-dose irradiation alters the radio-sensitivity of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering May 2012, Beijing, China.
5. Vaiserman A, Koliada A, Zabuga O, Socol Y. Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues. Dose Response 2018; 16(3): 1-27.
6. Zakeri F, Hirobe T. A cytogenetic approach to the effects of low levels of ionizing radiations on occupationally exposed individuals. Eur J Radiol 2010; 73(1): 191-5.
7. Dublin LI, Spiegelman M. Mortality of medical specialists, 1938-1942. JAMA 1948; 137(17): 1519-24.
8. Yoshinaga S, Mabuchi K, Sigurdson AJ, Doody MM, Ron E. Cancer risks among radiologists and radiologic technologists: review of epidemiologic studies. Radiology 2004; 233(2): 313-21.
9. Doll R. Mortality of british radiologists: a lecture note. J Radiat Res 2005; 46(1): 123-9.
10. Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 2012; 41(1-2): 1-322.
11. Anderson RM. Cytogenetic biomarkers of radiation exposure. Clin Oncol 2019; 31(5): 311-8.
12. Li MO, Rudensky AY. T cell receptor signalling in the control of regulatory T cell differentiation and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2016; 16(4): 220-33.
13. Brengues M, Paap B, Bittner M, Amundson S, Seligmann B, Korn R, et al. Biodosimetry on small blood volume using gene expression assay. Health Phys 2010; 98(2): 179.
14. Bahreyni-Toossi MT, Sankian M, Azimian H, Najafi-Amiri M, Khademi S, Abdollahi-Dehkordi S, et al. In vivo study of interferon-γ, transforming growth factor-β, and interleukin-4 gene expression induced by radioadaptive response. J Cancer Res Ther 2021; 17(2): 537.
15. Organization WH. Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. At Energy Rev 2011.
16. Viau M, Testard I, Shim G, Morat L, Normil MD, Hempel WM, et al. Global quantification of γH2AX as a triage tool for the rapid estimation of received dose in the event of accidental radiation exposure. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2015; 793: 123-31.
17. Norppa H. Cytogenetic biomarkers and genetic polymorphisms. Toxicol Lett 2004; 149(1-3): 309-34.
18. Herate C, Sabatier L. Retrospective biodosimetry techniques: Focus on cytogenetics assays for individuals exposed to ionizing radiation. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 2020; 783: 108287.
19. Azimian H, Bahreyni TM, Fardid R, Khademi S, Salari E. Biological dosimetry for the identification of ionizing radiation exposure. J N Uni Med Sci 2016; 7(3): 691-703.
20. Zakeri F, Hirobe T. A cytogenetic approach to the effects of low levels of ionizing radiations on occupationally exposed individuals. Eur J Radiol 2010; 73(1): 191-5.
21. El-Shanshoury H, El-Shanshoury G, Abaza A. Evaluation of low dose ionizing radiation effect on some blood components in animal model. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 2016; 9(3): 282-93.
22. Tang FR, Loke WK, Khoo BC. Low-dose or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation–induced bioeffects in animal models. J Radiat Res 2017; 58(2):165-82.
23. Bahreyni-Toossi MT, Vosoughi H, Azimian H, Rezaei AR, Momennezhad M. In vivo exposure effects of 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile on the FDXR and XPA genes expression in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 2018;6(1): 32.
24. Omar-Nazir L, Shi X, Moller A, Mousseau T, Byun S, Hancock S, et al. Long-term effects of ionizing radiation after the Chernobyl accident: Possible contribution of historic dose. Environ Res 2018; 165: 55-62.
25. Bonassi S, Norppa H, Ceppi M, Strömberg U, Vermeulen R, Znaor A, et al. Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer: results from a pooled cohort study of 22 358 subjects in 11 countries. Carcinogenesis 2008; 29(6): 1178-83.
26. Bahreyni–Toossi MT, Fardid R, Rezaee A, Sadr–nabavi A, Rafatpanah H, Bolbolian M. Expression of apoptotic genes can distinguish radiation workers from normal population. Int J Low Radiat 2011; 8(5-6): 388-99.
27. Au WW. Usefulness of biomarkers in population studies: from exposure to susceptibility and to prediction of cancer. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007; 210(3-4): 239-46.
28. Iliakis G, Wang H, Perrault AR, Boecker W, Rosidi B, Windhofer F, et al. Mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair and chromosome aberration formation. Cytogenet Genome Res 2004; 104(1-4): 14-20.
29. Vodicka P, Musak L, Fiorito G, Vymetalkova V, Vodickova L, Naccarati A. DNA and chromosomal damage in medical workers exposed to anaesthetic gases assessed by the lymphocyte cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN] assay. A critical review. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 2016; 770: 26-34.
30. Roussel C, Witt KL, Shaw PB, Connor TH. Meta-analysis of chromosomal aberrations as a biomarker of exposure in healthcare workers occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 2019; 781: 207-17.
31. M’kacher R, Maalouf EE, Ricoul M, Heidingsfelder L, Laplagne E, Cuceu C, et al. New tool for biological dosimetry: reevaluation and automation of the gold standard method following telomere and centromere staining. Mutat Res 2014; 770: 45-53.
32. Saberi A, Salari E, Latifi SM. Cytogenetic analysis in lymphocytes from radiation workers exposed to low level of ionizing radiation in radiotherapy, CT-scan and angiocardiography units. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2013; 750(1-2): 92-95.
33. Fahmy A, El-Said A, Shabon M, Ahmed M, Said Z. Radio-adaptive Response: An Implication for the Biological Consequences of Low Dose-rate Exposure to X-Ray. Egyp J Radiat Sci App 2014; 27(1-2): 31-49.
34. Vellingiri B, Shanmugam S, Subramaniam MD, Balasubramanian B, Meyyazhagan A, Alagamuthu K, et al. Cytogenetic endpoints and Xenobiotic gene polymorphism in lymphocytes of hospital workers chronically exposed to ionizing radiation in Cardiology, Radiology and Orthopedic Laboratories. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2014; 100: 266-74.
35. Changizi V, Alizadeh MH, Mousavi A. A study of professional radiation hazards in CT scan and nuclear medicine workers using GTG-banding and solid stain. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2015; 29: 200.
36. El-Benhawy SA, Sadek NA, Behery AK, Issa NM, Ali OK. Chromosomal aberrations and oxidative DNA adduct 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine as biomarkers of radiotoxicity in radiation workers. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 2016; 9(3): 249-58.
37. Sulaiman KM. Chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of Dental Radiographers who exposed to diagnostic X-ray in Erbil city/Iraqi Kurdistan region. Tikrit J Pur Sci 2018; 22(9): 40-6.
38. Muttar AJ. Assessment of DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation in Al-Amal hospital for cancer in Baghdad. Iraq J Biotechnol 2017;16(3): 70-81.
39. Ae A, Ea K, Eo K, Fam ED. Chromosomal aberrations and hematological alterations among radiation-exposed health care workers in mansoura university hospitals, egypt. Egypt J Occup Med 2017; 41(3): 325-42.
40. Sakly A, Ayed Y, Chaari N, Akrout M, Bacha H, Cheikh HB. Assessment of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes from tunisian hospital workers exposed to ionizing radiation. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013; 17(9): 650-5.
41. Pajic J, Rakic B, Jovicic D, Milovanovic A. A cytogenetic study of hospital workers occupationally exposed to radionuclides in Serbia: premature centromere division as novel biomarker of exposure? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016; 89(3): 477-84.
42. Tian XL, Lu X, Cai TJ, Lyu YM, Tian M, Liu QJ. Cytogenetic monitoring of peripheral blood lymphocytes from medical radiation professionals occupationally exposed to low-dose ionizing radiation. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2021; 867: 503370.
43. Lusiyanti Y, Kurnia I, Suvifan VA, Sardini S, Purnami S, Rahajeng N. Evaluation of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in medical workers chronically exposed to low dose ionizing radiation. Biosaintifika: J Biol Educ 2017; 9(3): 585-91.
44. Djokovic-Davidovic J, Milovanovic A, Milovanovic J, Antic V, Gajic M. Analysis of chromosomal aberrations frequency, haematological parameters and received doses by nuclear medicine professionals. J BUON 2016; 21: 1307-15.
45. Pujol-Canadell M, Perrier JR, Cunha L, Shuryak I, Harken A, Garty G, et al. Cytogenetically-based biodosimetry after high doses of radiation. PloS one. 2020;15(4): 1-12.
46. Diana C, Popescu I-A, Cîmpeanu M-M, editors. Cytokinesis–Block Micronucleus (CBMN] Assessment for Medical Personnel Occupationally Exposed to Ionizing Radiation. 2020 International Conference on e-Health and Bioengineering (EHB); 2020: IEEE.
47. Bahreyni Toossi MT, Azimian H, Sarrafzadeh O, Mohebbi S, Soleymanifard S. Automatic detection of micronuclei by cell microscopic image processing. Mutat Res 2017; 806: 9-18.
48. Mikhalevich LS, De Zwart FA, Perepetskaya G A, Chebotareva NV, Mikhalevich EA, Tates AD. Radiation effects in lymphocytes of children living in a Chernobyl contaminated region of Belarus. Int J Radiat Biol 2000; 76(10): 1377-85.
49. Kirsch-Volders M, Decordier I, Elhajouji A, Plas Gو Aardema MJ, Fenech M. In vitro genotoxicity testing using the micronucleus assay in cell lines, human lymphocytes and 3D human skin models. Mutagenesis 2011; 26(1): 177-84.
50. Terzic S, Milovanovic A, Dotlic J, Rakic B, Terzic M. New models for prediction of micronuclei formation in nuclear medicine department workers. J Occup Med Toxicol 2015; 10(1): 1-8.
51. Milić M, Rozgaj R, Kašuba V, Jazbec AM, Starčević B, Lyzbicki B, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes: link with biomarkers of the CBMN cytome assay in hospital workers chronically exposed to low doses of ionising radiation. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2015; 66(2): 109-19.
52. Sultana S, Tabassum S, Sultana T, Al-Ghanim K, Shah K, Shahid T, et al. A cytogenic monitoring approach of hospital workers occuptionally exposed to ionizing radiations using micronucleus assay. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 2016; 13(2): 185-90.
53. Kumar D, Kumari S, Salian SR, Uppangala S, Kalthur G, Challapalli S, et al. Genetic instability in lymphocytes is associated with blood plasma antioxidant levels in health care workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation. Int J Toxicol 2016; 35(3): 327-35.
54. Pajic J, Jovicic D, PS Milovanovic A. Micronuclei as a marker for medical screening of subjects continuously occupationally exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. Biomarkers 2017; 22(5): 439-45.
55. Miszczyk J, Rawojć K, Panek A, Gałaś A, Kowalska A, Szczodry A, et al. Assessment of the nuclear medicine personnel occupational exposure to radioiodine. Eur J Radiol 2019; 121: 1087-99.
56. Eken A, Aydın A, Erdem O, Akay C, Sanal HT, Soykut B, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes of hospital staff occupationally exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. Toxicol Ind Health 2010; 26(5): 273-80.
57. Bouraoui S, Mougou S, Drira A, Tabka F, Bouali N, Mrizek N, et al. A cytogenetic approach to the effects of low levels of ionizing radiation (IR] on the exposed Tunisian hospital workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2013; 26(1): 144-54.
58. Velickova N, Milev M. Micronucleus assay as genotoxicity method to determine the human health risk. Int J Curr Res Chem Pharm Sci 2017; 4(5): 31-5.
59. Vral A, Decorte V, Depuydt J, Wambersie A, Thierens H. A semi‑automated FISH‑based micronucleus‑centromere assay for biomonitoring of hospital workers exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. Mol Med Rep 2016; 14(1): 103-10.
60. Gerić M, Popić J, Gajski G, Garaj-Vrhovac V. Cytogenetic status of interventional radiology unit workers occupationally exposed to low-dose ionising radiation: A pilot study. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2019; 843: 46-51.
61. Siama Z, Zosang-Zuali M, Vanlalruati A, Jagetia GC, Pau KS, Kumar NS. Chronic low dose exposure of hospital workers to ionizing radiation leads to increased micronuclei frequency and reduced antioxidants in their peripheral blood lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol 2019; 95(6); 697-709.
62. Gao J, Dong X, Liu T, Zhang L, Ao L. Antioxidant status and cytogenetic damage in hospital workers occupationally exposed to low dose ionizing radiation. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2020; 850: 503152.
63. Shafiee M, Borzoueisileh S, Rashidfar R, Dehghan M, Sisakht ZJ. Chromosomal aberrations in C-arm fluoroscopy, CT-scan, lithotripsy, and digital radiology staff. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2020; 849: 503131.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mousavikia S N, Bahreyni-Toossi M T, Khademi S, Azimian H. Evaluation of cytogenetic biomarkers in occupationally exposures of medical radiation-workers to low doses of ionizing radiation: A review article. Feyz 2022; 26 (2) :228-239
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-4482-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 26, Issue 2 (Bimonthly 2022) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 46 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645