[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 23, Issue 4 (Bimonthly 2019) ::
Feyz 2019, 23(4): 371-379 Back to browse issues page
The effect of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on experiential avoidance and worry in people with general anxiety disorder
Nastaran Mohajeri-Aval , Mohammad Narimani * , Goudarz Sadeghi , Nader Hajloo
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, I.R. Iran. , nastaranmohajeriaval@gmail.com
Abstract:   (261 Views)
Background: General anxiety disorder is one of the serious problems in mental health. The main aim of the present study was investigating the effect of tDCS on experiential avoidance and worry of people with general anxiety disorder.
Materials and Methods: In study, 30 person with general anxiety disorder were selected from Tehran clinic’s clients using purposeful sampling. All subjects were evaluated before and after treatment by Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQII) and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). Subjects randomly were divided into experimental and control groups. Subjects in experimental group received tDCS. Training sessions were conducted for 15 days, each day one session 20 minutes in F3/F4 with an intensity of 2 mA.
Results: Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance. The results showed that there is a significant difference between experimental and control group in improving the experiential avoidance and worry (P=0.001).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that tDCS can improve experiential avoidance and worry in people with general anxiety disorder.
Keywords: tDCS, General Anxiety Disorder, Experiential avoidance, Worry
Full-Text [PDF 315 kb]   (18 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: medicine, paraclinic
Received: 2019/03/4 | Accepted: 2019/07/15 | Published: 2019/09/30
References
1. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences. Clinical Psychiatry. 10th ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2015. p. 715.
2. Hazlett-Stevens H. Psychological approaches to generalized anxiety disorder: A clinician’s guide to assessment and treatment. New York: Springer Verlag; 2008. P. 118.
3. Borkovec TD, Ray WJ, Stober J, Worry A. A cognitive phenomenon intimately linked to affective, Physiological, and interpersonal behavioral processes. Cognit Ther Res 1998; 22(6): 561-76.
4. Maier W, Gansick M, Freyberger HJ, Linz M, Heun R, Lecrubier Y. Generalized anxiety disorder (ICD-10) in primary care from a cross-cultural perspective: a valid diagnostic entity? Acta Psychi Scand 2000; 101(1): 29-36.
5. Ballenger JC, Davidson JR, Lecrubier Y, Nutt DJ, Borkovec TD, Rickels K. Consensus statement on generalized anxiety disorder from the International Consensus Group on Depression and Anxiety. J Clin Psychiatr 2001; 62(11): 8-53.
6. Brown TA, Campbell LA, Lehman CL, Grisham JR, and Mancill, RB. Current and lifetime comorbidity of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders in a large clinical sample. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 70(2): 288-98.
7. Juarascio AS. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a novel treatment for eating disorders: An initial test of efficacy and mediation (Doctoral Dissertation, Drexel University); 2011.
8. Feldner MT, Zvolensky MJ, Eifert GH, Spira AP. Emotional avoidance: an experimemtal test of individual differences and response suppression using biological challenge. Behav Res Ther 2003; 41: 403-11.
9. Lee J, Orsillo SM, Roemer L, Allen L. Distress and avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: Exploring the relationships with intolerance of uncertainty and worry. Cognit Behav Ther 2010; 39: 126-36.
10. Kashdan TB, Morina N, Priebe S. Post-traumatic stress disorder, social anxiety disorder and depression in survivors of the Kosovo War: Experimental avoidance as a contributor to distress and quality of life. J Anxiety Disord 2009; 23: 185-96.
11. Borkovec TD, Ruscio AM. Psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychiatr 2001; 62(11): 37-42.
12. Durham RC, Allan T. Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. A review of the clinical significance of results in outcome studies since 1980. Br J Psychiatr 1993; 163(1): 19-26.
13. Amtz A. Cognitive therapy versus applied relaxation as treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther 2013; 41(6): 633-46.
14. Rostami R, Hamidi Kenar A, Mirzaiyan B, Rezai M. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulus on the rate of drug craing in addicted person. J Mazandaran Med Sci Uni 2015; 22(1): 163-73. [in Persian]
15. Young CB, Wu SS, Menon V. The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychol Sci 2012; 23: 492-501.
16. Boggio PS, Zaghi F, Fregni F. Modulation of emotions associated with images of human pain using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 212-17.
17. Gallegos LV, Navarrete RM, Nunez LT, Robles AR. Nicotin craving questionnaire (CNN): Psychometric properties on Mexican population. J Salud Ment 2012; 35(4): 273-7.
18. Herrington JD, Mohanty A, Koven NS, Fisher JE, Stewart JL, Banich MT, et al. Emotion-modulated performance and activity in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Emot 2005; 5: 200-07.
19. Wolkenstein L, Zeiller M, Kanske P, Plewnia C. Induction of a depression-like negativity bias by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Cerebr Cortex 2014; 59: 103-12.
20. Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Blognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS): Challenges and future directions. Brain Stimu 2012; 5(3): 175-95.
21. Shiozawa P, Leiva APG, Castro CD, da Silva ME, Cordeiro Q, Fegni F, et al. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Case Study. J Psychiatr Neurosci Ther 2014; 75(11): 17-8.
22. Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M. TDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res 2012; 216: 1-10.
23. Clark VP, Coffman BA, Trumbo MC, Gasparovic C. Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) produces localized and specific alterations in neurochemistry: a (1) H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neurosci Lett 2011; 500: 67-71.
24. Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 2005; 568: 291-303.
25. Nitsche MA, Lampe C, Antal A, Liebetan D, Lang N, Tergau F, et al. Dopaminergic modulation of long-lasting direct current-induced cortical excitability changes in the humanmotor cortex. Eur. J Neurosci 2006; 23: 1651-7.
26. Teo F, Hoy K, Daskalakis Z, Fitzgerald P. Investigating the role of current strength in TDCS modulation of working memory performance in healthy controls. Front Psychiatr 2011; 2: 1-6.
27. Brunoni AR, Valiengol L, Baccaro A, Zanao TA. The sertraline vs electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatr 2013; 70(4): 383-91.
28. Dasilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. RACGP Online. electrode-positioning-montage-transcranial-direct-current. [Accessed Mar 15, 2013]. Available at: URL: http://www.jove.com/pdf/2744/jove-protocol-2744.
29. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, et al. Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance. Behav Ther 2011.
30. Monsetes JL, Villatte M, Mouras H, Loas G, Bond FW. French Translation and validation of the Acceptance & Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) 2009; 29: 301-308.
31. Abasi, E, Fti L, Molodi R, Zarabi H. Psychometric properties of Persian version of acceptance and action questionnaire-II. J Manag Sys 2013; 2(10): 65-80. [in Persian]
32. Davey CLG, Wells A. Worry and its psychological disorders theory, assessment and treatment. London: Wiley; 2006.
33. Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther 1990; 28: 487-95.
34. Davey GC. A comparison of three worry questionnaires. Behav Res Ther 1993; 31: 51-6.
35. Brown TA, Antony MM, Barlow DH. Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in a clinical anxiety disorders sample. Behav Res Ther 1992; 30: 33-7.
36. Dehshiri GHR, Golzari M, Borjali A, Sohrabi F. Psychometrics particularity of farsi version of Pennsylvania state worry questionnaire for college student. J Clin Psychol 2009; 4(4): 67-75. [in Persian]
37. Bation RPE, Heasebeart F, Saoud M Brunelin. Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder, an open-label pilot study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Bio Psychi 2016; 65: 7-153.
38. Alizadeh Goradel J, Pouresmali A, Mowlaie MF SM. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on obsession-compulsion, anxiety and depression of a patient suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Pract Clin Psychol 2016; 4: 75-80.
39. Hampstead BM, Briceno E, Mascaro N, Mourdoukoutas M, Bikson A. Current status of transcranial direct current stimulation in posttraumatic stress and other anxiety disorders. Curr Behav Neurosci Repres 2016; 3: 95-101.
40. Qin S, Hermans EJ, Marle H, Luo J Fernandez. Acute psychological stress reduces working memory-related activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, Biol Psychiatr 2009; 66(1): 25-32.
41. Sarkar A, Dowker A, Kadosh RC. Cognitive enhancement or cognitive cost: trait-specific outcomes of brain stimulation in the case of mathematics. J Neurosci 2014; 34(50): 16605-10.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohajeri-Aval N, Narimani M, Sadeghi G, Hajloo N. The effect of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on experiential avoidance and worry in people with general anxiety disorder. Feyz. 2019; 23 (4) :371-379
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3832-en.html


Volume 23, Issue 4 (Bimonthly 2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی پژوهشی فیض ::: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان KAUMS Journal ( FEYZ )
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3977