[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
:: Volume 23, Issue 2 (Bimonthly 2019) ::
Feyz Med Sci J 2019, 23(2): 185-191 Back to browse issues page
Major depressive disorder: a study based on revised-reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality
Behrooz Afshari * , Fatemeh Sadat Ghoreishi , Shafigheh Yousefi , Vajiheh Ghorbani
Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, I. R. Iran. , behrooz.afshari71@gmail.com
Abstract:   (3194 Views)
Background:  Study of personality can help to explanation of pathology in mental disorders. The aim of this study was to examine major depressive disorder (MDD) based on revised- reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST).
Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients with MDD along with 45 healthy individuals as a control group participated in the present study. Following the informed consent form, Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-I), General Intelligence Test (SGIT), Jackson's 5-factor questionnaire for assessing personality, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) were administered to the two groups. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, independent t-test, analyses of variance (ANOVA), and multiple analyses of variance (MANOVA).
Results: MANOVA results showed a significant difference between MDD and control groups in the items of Jackson's 5-items questionnaire. The MDD group score in r-BAS (P<0.001, h2=0.242) was lower than that of the control group but was higher in r-BIS (P<0.001, h2=0.367), Fight (P<0.001, h2=0.245), Flight (P<0.001, h2=0.068) and Freeze (P<0.001, h2=0.081).
Conclusion: Depression is significantly related to behavioral inhibition system but not related to behavior activation system. A more knowledge of r-RST can help in the diagnosis, aberration and continuation of common mental disorders. The results of this study can help in understanding the pathology associated with the personality of patients with MDD.
Keywords: Personality, Revised reinforcement sensitivity theory, Major depressive disorder
Full-Text [PDF 291 kb]   (1594 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: medicine, paraclinic
Received: 2018/10/20 | Revised: 2019/06/11 | Accepted: 2019/03/5 | Published: 2019/06/10
References
1. Bagby RM, Parker JD. Relation of rumination and distraction with neuroticism and extraversion in a sample of patients with major depression. Cognit Ther Res 2001; 25(1): 91-102.
2. Boyle LL, Lyness JM, Duberstein PR, Karuza J, King DA, Messing S, et al. Trait neuroticism, depression, and cognitive function in older primary care patients. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry 2010; 18(4): 305-12.
3. Kendler KS, Kuhn J, Prescott CA. The interrelationship of neuroticism, sex, and stressful life events in the prediction of episodes of major depression. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161(4): 631-6.
4. Knutson B, Bhanji JP, Cooney RE, Atlas LY, Gotlib IH. Neural responses to monetary incentives in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 63(7): 686-92.
5. Santesso DL, Bogdan R, Birk JL, Goetz EL, Holmes AJ, Pizzagalli DA. Neural responses to negative feedback are related to negative emotionality in healthy adults. Social Cognit Affect Neuro 2011; 7(7): 794-803.
6. Smoski MJ, Felder J, Bizzell J, Green SR, Ernst M, Lynch TR, et al. fMRI of alterations in reward selection, anticipation, and feedback in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 2009; 118(1-3): 69-78.
7. Kumar P, Waiter G, Ahearn T, Milders M, Reid I, Steele J. Abnormal temporal difference reward-learning signals in major depression. Brain 2008; 131(Pt 8): 2084-93.
8. Pizzagalli DA, Jahn AL, O’Shea JP. Toward an objective characterization of an anhedonic phenotype: a signal-detection approach. Biological Psych 2005; 57(4): 319-27.
9. Pizzagalli DA, Iosifescu D, Hallett LA, Ratner KG, Fava M. Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: evidence from a probabilistic reward task. J Psychiatric Res 2008; 43(1): 76-87.
10. Gray JA. A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. A model for personality: Springer 1981. p. 246-76.
11. Gray J. Oxford psychology series. The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press. Aveilable at: http://dx. doi. org/10.1017/S0140525X00013066; 1982.
12. Corr PJ. Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST): Introduction. 2008.
13. Gray JA, van Goozen S, Van de Poll N, Sergeant J. Framework for a taxonomy of psychiatric disorder. Emotions: Essays Emotion Theory 1994: 29-59.
14. Mussap AJ. Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and body change behaviour in males. Pers Individ Dif 2006; 40(4): 841-52.
15. Corr PJ. The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
16. Afshari B, Rasouli-Azad M, Ghoreishi FS. Comparison of original and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory in clinically-stable schizophrenia and bipolar disorder patients. Pers Individ Dif 2019; 138: 321-7.
17. Coplan RJ, Wilson J, Frohlick SL, Zelenski J. A person-oriented analysis of behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation in children. Pers Individ Dif 2006; 41(5): 917-27.
18. Takahashi Y, Roberts BW, Yamagata S, Kijima N. Personality traits show differential relations with anxiety and depression in a nonclinical sample. Psychologia 2015; 58(1): 15-26.
19. Harnett PH, Reid N, Loxton NJ, Lee N. The relationship between trait mindfulness, personality and psychological distress: A revised reinforcement sensitivity theory perspective. Pers Individ Dif 2016; 99: 100-5.
20. Fayazi M, Hasani J. Structural relations between brain-behavioral systems, social anxiety, depression and internet addiction: With regard to revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST). Computers Human Behav 2017; 72: 441-8.
21. Fowles DC. Biological variables in psychopathology: A psychobiological perspective. Comprehensive handbook of psychopathology: Springer; 2002. p. 85-104.
22. Miu AC, Bîlc MI, Bunea I, Szentágotai-Tătar A. Childhood trauma and sensitivity to reward and punishment: Implications for depressive and anxiety symptoms. Pers Individ Dif 2017; 119: 134-40.
23. Kaplan BJ. Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry. Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry. Tijdschr Voor Psychiatr 2016; 58(1): 78-9.
24. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB. The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II). Part I: Description. J Pers Dis 1995; 9(2): 83-91.
25. Sharifi V, Assadi SM, Mohammadi MR, Amini H, Kaviani H, Semnani Y, et al. A persian translation of the structured clinical interview for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: psychometric properties. Compr Psychiatry 2009; 50(1): 86-91.
26. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio 1996; 78(2): 490-8.
27. Meygoni AKM, Ahadi H. Declining the Rate of Major Depression: Effectiveness of Dialectical Behavior Therapy. Procedia-Social Behav Sci 2012; 35: 230-6.
28. Hasani J, Rasoli Azad M. Psychometric Properties of Jackson’s Five Factor Questionnaire: Scales of revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST). 2012.
29. Sportel BE, Nauta MH, de Hullu E, de Jong PJ. Predicting internalizing symptoms over a two year period by BIS, FFFS and attentional control. Pers Individ Dif 2013; 54(2): 236-40.
30. Zinbarg RE, Yoon KL. RST and clinical disorders: Anxiety Depression 2008.
31. Gomez R, Cooper A. Reinforcement sensitivity theory and mood induction studies. Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 291-316.
32. McNaughton N, Corr PJ. The neuropsychology of fear and anxiety: A foundation for reinforcement sensitivity theory. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 44-94.
33. Bijttebier P, Beck I, Claes L, Vandereycken W. Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality–psychopathology associations. Clin Psychol Rev 2009; 29(5): 421-30.
34. Gilbert P, Gilbert J. Entrapment and arrested fight and flight in depression: An exploration using focus groups. PSYCHOL PSYCHOTHER-T 2003; 76(2): 173-88.
35. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (DSM-5): Amer Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Afshari B, Ghoreishi F S, Yousefi S, Ghorbani V. Major depressive disorder: a study based on revised-reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Feyz Med Sci J 2019; 23 (2) :185-191
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3726-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 23, Issue 2 (Bimonthly 2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 46 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660