[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
:: Volume 20, Issue 6 (Bimonthly 2017) ::
Feyz Med Sci J 2017, 20(6): 525-531 Back to browse issues page
Phenotypic evaluation of biofilm producing ability in Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Naghmeh Moori-Bakhtiari * , Maryam Moslemi
Department of Microbiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, I. R. Iran. , n.moori@scu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (4967 Views)

Background: Like genomic changes, the ability for biofilm production is considered as one of the antibiotic resistant factors in bacteria which can cause recurrent infections.  The infection resulted from Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus is the most common form of such complications manifested as recurrent infections. The aim of this study was to investigate biofilm production ability among isolated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients with different types of clinical infection.

Material and Methods: Fifty Staphylococcus aureus strains were isolated from different specimens and identified by biochemical and species-specific PCR tests. Methicillin- resistance specificity of isolates was confirmed by disk diffusion method and mecA gene presence; the biofilm- forming ability was evaluated by crystal violet microtiter plate assay and Congo red agar (CRA).

Results: Using turbidimetry with no acetic acid, the ability for biofim production was seen at 550 and 492 nm in 34 (68%) and 28 isolates (56%), respectively. In both methods, the most of isolates were weak biofilm producers. In CRA, 94% of isolates were biofilm producers which most (72.3%) of them were moderate producers.

Conclusions: While with the consideration of three studied methods high percentages of isolates were biofilm producers and despite the significant correlation seen between their results, there was a higher correlation coefficient between the results obtained from crystalviolet-treated microtiter plates with two reading methods.

Keywords: Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, Biofilm, Crystal violet microtiter plate, Congo red agar medium
Full-Text [PDF 233 kb]   (1991 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/01/2 | Revised: 2017/07/24 | Accepted: 2017/01/2 | Published: 2017/01/2
References
1. Lora-Tamayo J, Murillo O, Iribarren JA, Soriano A, Sánchez-Somolinos M, Baraia-Etxaburu JM, et al. A large multicenter study of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections managed with implant retention. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56(2): 182–94.
2. Salgado CD, Dash S, Cantey JR, Marculescu CE. Higher risk of failure of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 461: 48–53.
3. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999; 284(5418): 1318–22.
4. Swan A, Amer H, Dieppe P. The value of synovial fluid assays in the diagnosis of joint disease: a literature survey. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61(6): 493–8.
5. Simon GL, Miller HG, Borenstein DG. Synovial fluid inhibits killing of Staphylococcus aureus by neutrophils. Infect Immun 1983; 40(30): 1004–10.
6. Dastgheyb S, Parvizi J, Shapiro IM, Hickok NJ, Otto1 M. Effect of Biofilms on Recalcitrance of Staphylococcal Joint Infection to Antibiotic Treatment. J Infectious Dis 2015; 211(4): 641–50
7. Post JC, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L, Ehrlich GD. The role of biofilms in otolaryngologic infections. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12(3): 185–90.
8. Mack D, Beckerb P, Chatterjeec I, Dobinskya S, Knoblocha JKM, Petersb G, et al. Mechanisms of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus: functional molecules, regulatory circuits, and adaptive responses. Int J Med Microbiol 2004; 294(2): 203–12.
9. Kawamura H, Nishi J, Imuta N, Tokuda K, Miyanohara H, Hashigu‌chi T, et al. Quantitative analysis of biofilm formation of meth‌icillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains from pa‌tients with orthopaedic device-related infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2011; 63(1): 10-5.
10. Joo HS, Otto M. Molecular basis of in vivo biofilm formation by bacterial pathogens. Chem Biol 2012; 19(12): 1503–13.
11. Atshan SS, Shamsudin MN, Lung LT, Sekawi Z, Ghaznavi-Rad E, Pei CP. Comparative characterisation of genotypically different clones of MRSA in the production of biofilms. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012; 2012: 417247.
12. Sasirekha B, Usha MS, Amruta AJ, Ankit S. Evaluation and Com‌parison of Different Phenotypic Tests to Detect Methicillin Resis‌tant Staphylococcus aureus and their Biofilm Production. Int J Pharm Tech Res 2012; 4(2): 532-541.
13. Samie A, Shivambu N. Biofilm production and antibiotic suscep‌tibility profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from HIV and AIDS patients in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Afr J Biotech‌nol 2011; 10(65): 14625-36.
14. Moori Bakhtiari N, Jamshidian J, Khalafi E. Effect of Juglans regia Li. Stem Bark Hydroalcoholic Extract on Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod 2016; 11(1): e29095.
15. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Dakic I, Savic B, Svabic-Vlahovic M. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods 2000; 40(2): 175–9.
16. Stepanović S, Vuković D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukić S, Cirković I, et al. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 2007; 115(8): 891–9.
17. Rezaei M, Moniri R, Mousavi SGA, Jabari Shiade M. Prevalence of Biofilm Formation Among Methicillin Resistance Staphylococ‌cus aureus Isolated From Nasal Carriers. Jundishapur J Microbiol; 6(6): e9601.
18. El-Shekh NA, Ayoub AM, El-Hendawy HH, Abada EA, Khalifa SY. In vitro Activity of some Antimicrobial Agents against Intact and Disrupted Biofilms of Staphylococci in the Indwelling Vascular Catheter Patients. World Appl Sci J 2010; 10(1): 108-20.
19. El-Feky MA, El-Rehewy MS, Hassan MA, Abolella HA, Abd El-Baky RM, Gad GF. Effect of ciprofloxacin and N-acetylcysteine on bacte‌rial adherence and biofilm formation on ureteral stent surfaces. Pol J Microbiol 2009; 58(3): 261-7.
20. Molina A, Del Campo R, Maiz L, Morosini MI, Lamas A, Baquero F, et al. High prevalence in cystic fibrosis patients of multiresistant hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST228-SCCmecI capable of biofilm formation. J Antimicrob Che‌mother 2008; 62(5): 961-7.
21. O'Neill E, Pozzi C, Houston P, Smyth D, Humphreys H, Robinson DA, et al. Association between methicillin susceptibility and bio‌film regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45(5): 1379-88.
22. Wang L, Yu F, Yang L, Li Q, Zeng XZ, Xu Y. Prevalence of virulence genes and bio‌film formation among Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates associated with lower respiratory infection. Afr J Microbiol Res 2010; 4(23): 2566-9.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moori-Bakhtiari N, Moslemi M. Phenotypic evaluation of biofilm producing ability in Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Feyz Med Sci J 2017; 20 (6) :525-531
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3226-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 20, Issue 6 (Bimonthly 2017) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 46 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660