[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
AI::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
metrics
Journal volumes: 30
Journal issues: 155
Articles views: 20824150
Articles downloads: 7255841

Total authors: 7815
Unique authors: 5420
Repeated authors: 2395
Repeated authors percent: 31

Submitted articles: 5125
Accepted articles: 2188
Rejected articles: 2852
Published articles: 2079

Acceptance rate: 42.69
Rejection rate: 55.65

Average Time to Accept: 193 days
Average Time to First Review: 15.2 days
Average Time to Publish: 42.5 days

Last 3 years statistics:
Submitted articles: 602
Accepted articles: 201
Rejected articles: 320
Published articles: 201

Acceptance rate: 33.39
Rejection rate: 53.16

Average Time to Accept: 107 days
Average Time to First Review: 10.4 days
Average Time to Publish: 40.9 days
____
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 2 (Quarterly 2002) ::
Feyz Med Sci J 2002, 6(2): 13-17 Back to browse issues page
A comparison of Cataract surgery complications under local anesthesia plus intracameral Lidocaine with general anesthesia
Mohammad Reza Soleimani *
Abstract:   (11407 Views)

Background: Cataract is one of the common senile diseases. Globally, it is estimated that 20 million subjects are blind due to cataract. Anesthesia modality in cataract surgery is a challenge. The present study was carried out to compare the complications of local anesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine 2% with general anesthesia during cataract surgery.

Materials and Methods: 55 patients undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled in this clinical trial. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, receiving either local anesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine 2% (n=28) or general anesthesia (n=27). We evaluated corneal edema, anterior chamber inflammation and intraocular pressure and followed them up for 2 months. Independent t-test and Fisher’s exact test were applied for statistical analysis.

Results: There was no significant difference in corneal edema, anterior chamber inflammation and intraocular pressure between two groups in 1, 2, 15, 30 and 60 days after cataract surgery. These complications were more common during the first day following the surgery.

Conclusion: Local anesthesia supplemented with intracameral lidocaine 2% was an effective and safe alternative to general anesthesia in cataract surgery. This two methods have similar ocular complications, however, systemic complications of general anesthesia limit its usage for senile patients.

Keywords: Cataract surgery, Anesthesia modality, Intracameral lidocaine
Full-Text [PDF 898 kb]   (2813 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2008/11/9 | Published: 2002/07/15
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soleimani M R. A comparison of Cataract surgery complications under local anesthesia plus intracameral Lidocaine with general anesthesia . , Feyz Med Sci J. 2002; 6 (2) :13-17
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-312-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 6, Issue 2 (Quarterly 2002) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.17 seconds with 48 queries by YEKTAWEB 4780