|
1. Pashler HE, Sutherland S. The psychology of attention: MIT Press Cambridge, MA; 1998. 2. Zylberberg A, Ouellette B, Sigman M, Roelfsema PR. Decision Making during the Psychological Refractory Period. Curr Biol 2012; 22(19): 1795-9. 3. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull 1994; 116(2): 220. 4. Miller J, Alderton M. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Psychol Res 2006; 70(6): 484-93. 5. Miller J, Alderton M. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 2006; 32(1): 149-65. 6. Hommel B. Automatic stimulus–response translation in dual-task performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998; 24(5): 1368-84. 7. Hommel B, Eglau B. Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychol Res 2002; 66(4): 260-73. 8. Logan GD, Delheimer JA. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2001; 27(3): 668-85. 9. Ulrich R, Miller J. Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: Models and contamination effects. Cogn Psychol 2008; 57(2): 75-121. 10. Rinkenauer G, Ulrich R, Wing AM. Brief bimanual force pulses: correlations between the hands in force and time. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 2001; 27(6): 1485(6). 11. Tombu M, Jolicœur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 2003; 29(1): 3. 12. Lien MC, Proctor RW. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychon Bull Rev 2002; 9(2): 212-38. 13. Hazeltine E, Ruthruff E, Remington RW. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychol 2006; 52(4): 291-345.
|
.png){kind=logo}
