[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
AI::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
metrics
Journal volumes: 30
Journal issues: 155
Articles views: 20803127
Articles downloads: 7253414

Total authors: 7815
Unique authors: 5420
Repeated authors: 2395
Repeated authors percent: 31

Submitted articles: 5124
Accepted articles: 2188
Rejected articles: 2852
Published articles: 2079

Acceptance rate: 42.7
Rejection rate: 55.66

Average Time to Accept: 193 days
Average Time to First Review: 15.2 days
Average Time to Publish: 42.5 days

Last 3 years statistics:
Submitted articles: 603
Accepted articles: 201
Rejected articles: 322
Published articles: 201

Acceptance rate: 33.33
Rejection rate: 53.4

Average Time to Accept: 107 days
Average Time to First Review: 10.4 days
Average Time to Publish: 40.9 days
____
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 1 (Quarterly 2005) ::
Feyz Med Sci J 2005, 9(1): 9-15 Back to browse issues page
Biological Evaluation of Protein Quality of Soya bean and Wheat flour+soya
Mohsen Taghizadeh * , Zatolah Asemi , Naser Valaei
, taghizadeh_m@kaums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (12445 Views)

Background: Evaluating the protein quality of food is of high importance for biological and economical reasons. To determine quality of proteins different biological, microbiological, chemical and combined methods have been presented and used. Among them NPR, RNPR, and PER are considered the most appropriate methods. Using these methods, this study was conducted on Soya products to evaluate the protein quality of Soya in 2003.

Materials and Methods: In an experimental study, 32 male Wistar rats, aged 21-23 days, were assigned to 4 groups (8 in each). Each group underwent a diet: Soya, wheat flour+Soya (10% protein), Casein+Methionine (10% protein), and no protein diet (as control). Period of study for NPR was 14 days. Protein intake and weight increased were determined for calculating NPR. Period of study for PER was 28 days. Protein intake and weight gains of animals were determined. NPR, RNPR, and PER were evaluated by t test.

Results: NPR for Soya and Casein+methionine groups were 3.65 ± 0.35 and 4.37 ± 0.48 respectively (p< 0.01). RNPR was 83. In wheat flour+soya group NPR was 2.7 ± 0.3 (P<0.001) and RNPR was 62.7. PER were 2.28 ± 0.35 and 3.04 ± 0.24 for soya and Casein+Methionine respectively (P<0.001) and Soya PER/Casein PER was 75. PER was 1.1 ± 0.1 for Wheat flour+soya (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Protein quality of Soya is lower than Casein+Methionine.

Keywords: Protein quality, NPR, RNPR, PER, Soya
Full-Text [PDF 281 kb]   (6573 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2008/11/1 | Revised: 2008/11/1 | Published: 2005/04/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taghizadeh M, Asemi Z, Valaei N. Biological Evaluation of Protein Quality of Soya bean and Wheat flour+soya. , Feyz Med Sci J. 2005; 9 (1) :9-15
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-149-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 9, Issue 1 (Quarterly 2005) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.16 seconds with 48 queries by YEKTAWEB 4780