[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
AI::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
metrics
Journal volumes: 30
Journal issues: 154
Articles views: 20440812
Articles downloads: 7130230

Total authors: 7783
Unique authors: 5402
Repeated authors: 2381
Repeated authors percent: 31

Submitted articles: 5101
Accepted articles: 2179
Rejected articles: 2844
Published articles: 2070

Acceptance rate: 42.72
Rejection rate: 55.75

Average Time to Accept: 194 days
Average Time to First Review: 15.3 days
Average Time to Publish: 42.9 days

Last 3 years statistics:
Submitted articles: 617
Accepted articles: 203
Rejected articles: 340
Published articles: 203

Acceptance rate: 32.9
Rejection rate: 55.11

Average Time to Accept: 106 days
Average Time to First Review: 10.7 days
Average Time to Publish: 42.9 days
____
..
:: Volume 15, Issue 1 (Quarterly 2011) ::
Feyz Med Sci J 2011, 15(1): 21-26 Back to browse issues page
A comparison between touch cytology and histology method in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection
Raika Jamali , Hosain Sharifi , Tahereh Mazoochi , Tahereh Khamechian * , Sayyed Mohammad Matini
Kashan University of Medical Sciences , drj1351@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (10651 Views)

Background: Touch cytology is one of the sensitive ways of diagnosing Helicobacter pylori in stomach biopsies. The current study was designed to compare touch cytology with histology method in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Materials and Methods: This study was performed on 150 dyspeptic patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Kashan Shahid Beheshti Hospital. Antrum samples (2-4) were taken from each of 150 patients. One biopsy sample was considered for touch cytology and the remaining biopsy samples were studied for histological examination.

Results: Eighty-three out of 150 patients (55.3%) were men with the mean age of 46.63±5.93 years. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the touch cytology method were 95.65%, 100%, 100% and 66%, respectively, while in the histology method they were 84.78%, 100%, 100% and 36.36%, respectively. The sensitivity of the touch cytology was more than that of the histology method (P<0.001) in the diagnosis of H. pylori.

Conclusion: Since the cytology method is more sensitive with equal specificities in relation to histology method, when the histological information is not necessary, the cytology method can be considered more reliable for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori.

Keywords: Cytology, Helicobacter pylori, Histology, Sensitivity and specificity
Full-Text [PDF 228 kb]   (2718 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2011/03/29 | Revised: 2011/04/9 | Published: 2011/04/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jamali R, Sharifi H, Mazoochi T, Khamechian T, Matini S M. A comparison between touch cytology and histology method in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection . Feyz Med Sci J 2011; 15 (1) :21-26
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-1102-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 15, Issue 1 (Quarterly 2011) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 48 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774