[صفحه اصلی ]   [Archive] [ English ]  
:: صفحه اصلي :: درباره مجله :: شماره جاری :: تمام شماره‌ها :: جستجو :: ثبت نام :: ارسال مقاله :: تماس با ما ::
بخش‌های اصلی
صفحه اصلی::
اطلاعات نشریه::
بانک‌ها و نمایه‌ها::
آرشیو مجله و مقالات::
برای نویسندگان::
اخلاق در پژوهش::
برای داوران::
تسهیلات پایگاه::
تماس با ما::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
جستجو در پایگاه

جستجوی پیشرفته
..
دریافت اطلاعات پایگاه
نشانی پست الکترونیک خود را برای دریافت اطلاعات و اخبار پایگاه، در کادر زیر وارد کنید.
..
enamad
..
:: دوره 26، شماره 2 - ( دوماه نامه 1401 ) ::
جلد 26 شماره 2 صفحات 183-166 برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
اثربخشی مداخلات توان‌بخشی شناختی (مبتنی‌بر رایانه و کلاسیک) بر عملکرد شناختی کودکان مبتلا به اختلال یادگیری خاص در ایران: یک مطالعه فراتحلیل
فائزه شعبانعلی فمی ، سوگند قاسم زاده ، سمیه نجاتی
گروه روانشناسی و آموزش کودکان استثنائی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران ، s.ghasemzadeh@ut.ac.ir
چکیده:   (1674 مشاهده)
سابقه و هدف: مداخلات توان‌بخشی شناختی به‌عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین مداخلات مؤثر در بهبود عملکرد شناختی کودکان دارای اختلالات یادگیری خاص شناخته می‌شود. هدف از این پژوهش فراتحلیل، بررسی اثربخشی توان‌بخشی شناختی مبتنی‌بر رایانه و کلاسیک بر بهبود عملکرد شناختی این کودکان در ایران بوده است.
مواد و روش‌ها: این مطالعه به‌صورت فراتحلیل بر جامعه آماری کلیه پژوهش‌های انجام‌شده در حوزه مداخلات شناختی مبتنی‌بر رایانه و کلاسیک بر اختلال یادگیری خاص طی سال‌های 1399-1389 در ایران با استفاده از مقالات مرتبط با هدف پژوهش از پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی مجلات علمی - پژوهشی در حوزه روانشناسی و علوم‌تربیتی نظیر پایگاه داخلی پرتال جامع علوم انسانی (ensani.ir پایگاه مجلات تخصصی نور (noormags.ir)، پایگاه مرکز اطلاعات علمی جهاد دانشگاهی (sid.ir)، گوگل اسکلار (scholar.google.com)، بانک اطلاعات نشریات کشور: مگ ایران (magiran.com)، بانک مقالات پزشکی ایران (idml.research.ac.ir) انجام پذیرفته است که 40 پژوهش که از لحاظ روش‌شناسی موردقبول بوده‌اند، انتخاب ‌شدند و فراتحلیل بر آن‌ها انجام گرفت.
نتایج: این پژوهش فراتحلیل به‌طور مجموع دارای 1061 نمونه و 40 اندازه اثر بود که نتایج نشان داد میزان اندازه اثر توان‌بخشی شناختی مبتنی‌بر رایانه و کلاسیک بر بهبود عملکرد شناختی کودکان مبتلا به اختلال ویژه یادگیری درمجموع برابر (0/95d=) می‌باشد (مبتنی‌بر رایانه معادل (0/01 d=) و کلاسیک معادل (0/90 d=) که این اندازه اثرها طبق جدول کوهن دارای اثر بالایی است.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج کلی نشان‌دهنده این موضوع است که انجام توان‌بخشی‌های شناختی مبتنی‌بر رایانه و کلاسیک بر بهبود عملکرد شناختی کودکان مبتلا به اختلال یادگیری خاص در ایران اثربخشی بالایی داشته است.
 
واژه‌های کلیدی: فراتحلیل، ناتوانی‌های یادگیری، اختلال یادگیری خاص، اختلال یادگیری ریاضی، اختلال نارساخوانی، توان‌بخشی شناختی، عملکرد شناختی، درمان، رایانه – محور
متن کامل [PDF 462 kb]   (681 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: مروري | موضوع مقاله: عمومى
دریافت: 1400/9/1 | ویرایش نهایی: 1401/3/16 | پذیرش: 1401/1/10 | انتشار: 1401/3/9
فهرست منابع
1. Nosrat F, Ghobari Bonab B, Vakilinejad M, Afshar H. Effectiveness of direct instruction in math performance of students with specific learning disability. J Learn Disabil 2016; 5(4): 108-22. [in Persian]
2. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®): APA; 2013.
3. Farrington C, Clare I, Holland A, Barrett M, Oborn E. Knowledge exchange and integrated services: experiences from an integrated community intellectual (learning) disability service for adults. J Intellect Disabil Res 2015; 59(3): 238-47.
4. Siminghalam M, Alibakhshi H, Ahmadi Zadeh Z. An investigation of bilateral Coordination of children with specific learning disorder. J Paramed Sci 2016; 5(1): 7-13. [in Persian]
5. Hasani Abharian P. 20% of the country's primary school students have learning disabilities. Irna 2020. [in Persian]
6. Pumfrey MPD, Pumfrey P, Reason R. Specific learning difficulties (dyslexia): Challenges and responses. Routledge 2013.
7. Howley SA, Prasad SE, Pender NP, Murphy KC. Relationship between reaction time, fine motor control, and visual–spatial perception on vigilance and visual-motor tasks in 22q11. 2 Deletion Syndrome. Res Dev Disabil 2012; 33(5): 1495-502.
8. Nelson LD, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Hammeke T, Barr W, Randolph C, et al. Multiple self-reported concussions are more prevalent in athletes with ADHD and learning disability. Clin J Sport Med 2016; 26(2): 120.
9. Shahmohamadi M, Entesarfooni G, Hejazi M, Asadzadeh H. The impact of cognitive rehabilitation training program on non-verbal intelligence, attention and concentration, and academic performance of students with dyscalculia. JCMH 2019; 6(2): 93-106. [in Persian]
10. Soleymani E, Nori R, Reshadat M. Study of Cognitive Function of Math Learning Disorder and Dyslexia Based on Reaction Time and Stroop Test. CECIRANJ 2016; 7(3): 17-28. [in Persian]
11. Arghavani M, Mosavi Nasab MH, Khezri Moghadam N. The effectiveness of cognitive empowerment on executive functions (inhibition, updating and shifting) in students with learning disorder. J Psychogy 2017; 5(8): 205-22. [in Persian]
12. Narimani M, Soleymani E. The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions (working memory and attention) and academic achievement in students with math learning disorder. J Learn Disabil 2013; 2(3): 91-115. [in Persian]
13. Soleimani M, Vakili, S. Effectiveness of Cognitive Rehabilitation on the Promotion of Reading and Working Memory in Students with Reading Learning Difficulties. J Appl Psychol res 2016; 7(1): 151-62. [in Persian]
14. Akbarifar H, Ahmadi A, Fathabadi R, Salehi H. The Effectiveness of Brain Cognitive Rehabilitation on Information Processing Speed and psychological refractory period in Children with Specific Learning Disorders. Neuropsychology 2020; 5(19): 41-52. [in Persian]
15. Bayrami M, Nazari M, Hashemi T, Movahedi Y. The Effectiveness of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Treatment on the Performance of Problem Solving in Patients With Math Learning Disabilities. IJRN 2017; 3(2): 61-7. [in Persian]
16. Janghoo E, Hemmati B, Jafarzadeh Dashbolagh Dashbolagh H. The effectiveness of play therapy on improving the speed of information processing and social/emotional processing in students with dyslexia. J Learn Disabil 2019; 9(1): 72-92. [in Persian]
17. Dehghani Y, Hekmatiyan Fard S. The effectiveness of executive functions training on attention and response inhibition in students with dyscalculia. JPE 2019; 9(34): 137-58. [in Persian]
18. Arjmandnia A, Sharifi A, Rostami R. The effectiveness of computerized cognitive training on the performance of visual-spatial working memory of students with mathematical problems. J Learn Disabil 2014; 3(4): 6-24. [in Persian]
19. Nevisi Z, Shiri M, Minaei B. Designing an intelligent computer game for prediction of dyslexia based on cognitive science. TEJ 2017; 12(3): 219-229. [in Persian]
20. Ketamo H, Suominen M. Learning-by-teaching in educational game: educational outcome, user experience and social networks. JILR 2010; 21(2): 237-55.
21. Keane RV. The effects of computer assisted instruction for students with learning disabilities in a self-contained social studies setting. Rowan Uni 2018.
22. Gaitán A, Garolera M, Cerulla N, Chico G, Rodriguez‐Querol M, Canela‐Soler J. Efficacy of an adjunctive computer‐based cognitive training program in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A single‐blind, randomized clinical trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013; 28(1): 91-9.
23. Bayrami M, Nazari M, Hashemi T, Movahedi Y. The effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation treatment on the continuous attention function of students with dyscalculia. J Community Health 2017; 10(3): 45-52. [in Persian]
24. Radfar F. The effect of attention training on executive function and reading in children with reading problems. [M.A Thesis in Child and Adolescent Clinical Psychology]. Tehran. Shahid Beheshti University Faculty of Education & Psychology. 2013. [in Persian]
25. Najarzadegan M, Nejati V, Amiri N. Effect of cognitive rehabilitation of working memory in reducing behavioral symptoms (attention deficit and impulsivity) of children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychology 2015; 1(1): 52-45. [in Persian]
26. Shamsi A, Abedi A, Samadi M, Ahmadzadeh M. A meta-Analysis of the efficacy of psychological and educational interventions to improve academic performance of students with mathematics learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 2013; 2(4): 61-81. [in Persian]
27. Siadatian S, Ghamarani A. Meta-analysis of psychological-educational interventions effectiveness on academic performance of dyslexic students. J Learn Disabil 2014; 3(2): 42-62. [in Persian]
28. Samadi M, Shamsi A, Ahmadzadeh M. Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Psychological and Educational Interventions to Improve Academic Performance of Students with Dyslexia. J Psychol 2015; 19(3): 270-85. [in Persian]
29. Rashidi A, Faramarzi S, Shamsi A. Meta-analysis of the effect of psychological nervous interventions on improving academic performance in students with specific learning disabilities. Shenakht J Psychol Psychiatry 2020; 6(6): 125-140. [in Persian]
30. Mohammadi Molod S, Mesrabadi J, Habibi Kaleybar R. Effectiveness of Educational and Therapeutic Interventions on Specific Learning Disorder: A meta-analysis study. J Except Child 2020; 20(2): 115-30. [in Persian]
31. Manavi Shad M, Mesrabadi J, Habibi Kelibar R, Farid A. Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Therapeutic-Educational Interventions on the Improvement of Specific Learning Disorder. J Child Ment Health 2020; 7(3): 264-277. [in Persian]
32. Mesrabadi J, Mohammadi Moulod S. Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Educational and Therapeutic Interventions on the Four Classes of Learning Disorders. AMUJ 2018; 21(1): 91-104. [in persian]
33. Mohammadi Molod S, Mesrabadi J, Habibi-Kaleybar R. Meta-analysis of the role of gender and age of the subjects on the effectiveness of educational and therapeutic interventions in learning disorders. JPE 2018; 8(31): 101-194. [in Persian]
34. Ahangar Ghorbani Z, Hajloo N, Sepehri Nasab Z, Moazez R. The effectiveness of working memory on academic performance of students with specific learning disorder: A meta-analysis study. J Learn Disabil 2019; 8(4): 7-26. [in Persian]
35. Ebrahimi M, Alizadeh H, Ghobari Bonab B, Dastjerdi Kazemi M, Bakhtiari A. A meta analysis of response to intervention model based researches on improving the academic performance of students at risk of math disorder. J Learn Disabil 2020; 9(3): 7-31. [in Persian]
36. Zangane H, Mohagheghi A, Zare Ehteshami M, Velayati E, Abolghasemi E. Meta-analysis of Studies on the Impact of Cognitive Strategies on Learning Performance of Primary Students with Learning Disabilities. SOECE 2016; 2(6): 81-100. [in persian]
37. Parhoon K, Parhoon H. A systematic review and Qualitative meta-analysis on the Identification patterns in Specific Learning disorder. RRJ 2020; 9(8): 213-28. [in Persian]
38. Radmanesh H, Omidian M, Shehnyyailagh M, Maktabi G. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Cogmed computerized cognitive training program on working memory. J Psychol 2022; 20(108): 2195-210. [in Persian]
39. Farahani H, Arizi, H. Advanced methods in the humanities. Isfahan: Isfahan University Jihad; 2005. [in Persian]
40. Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 1976; 5(10): 3-8.
41. Howitt D, Cramer D. Introduction to research methods in psychology. Pearson Education; 2007.
42. Pashasharifi H NJ, Mirhashemi M, Manavipur D, Sharifi N. Statistical methods in psychology and other behavioral sciences. Tehran: Sokhan; 2009. [in Persian]
43. Golabi P. Implementation of Lovaas programs for autistic children. 1996.
44. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4(1): 1-9.
45. Abedi A, Oreyzi H, Mohammad Zadeh F. An Introduction to the Meta Analysis Method in Educational Researches. MSSH 2006; 12(49): 122-40. [in Persian]
46. AD. Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences. Tehran: Virayesh; 2016.
47. Rosenthal R, DiMatteo MR. Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annu Rev Psychol 2001; 52(1): 59-82.
48. AliDoosti F, TalaeeZafarKhales, Nasrin, ShojaeeFar, Shirin. Improving Executive Functions and Reading Performance of Dyslexic Children in the context of Computer-assisted Cognitive Assignments. J Except Child 2021; 20(4): 66-51. [in Persian]
49. Sadati Baladehi M, Niusha B. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Computer Games with Traditional Iranian Games on Cognitive Flexibility and Response Inhibiting of Students with Mathematical Learning Disorder. J Educ Psychol 2019; 10(1). [in Persian]
50. Abbariki A, Yazdanbakhsh K, Momeni K. Investigating the effect of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation on reducing cognitive avoidance in Students with Specific Learning disorder. JPE 2019; 9(33): 69-96. [in Persian]
51. Habibi-Kaleybar R, Bahadorikhosroshahi J. Effectiveness of computerized cognitive rehabilitation on social cognition, inhibitory control and cognitive avoidance of students with learning disabilities. Neuropsychology 2019; 5(17): 89-108. [in Persian]
52. Movahedi Y. The effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation treatment on improving the performance of response inhibition in students with learning disabilities in math and dyscalculia. J Learn Disabil 2020; 9(2): 132-52. [in persian]
53. Akbarifar H, Sharifidaramadi P, Rahimzade H, Pezeshk S. The Effectiveness of the Intervention of Active Plays on Working Memory in Students with Dyslexia. Neuropsychology 2019; 5(16): 149-62. [in Persian]
54. Bayrami M, Movahedi Y. The Impact of the Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Treatment on the Problem-Solving Performance in Patients with Dyslexia Disabilities. J Community Health 2018; 12(2): 30-7. [in Persian]
55. Khaksar Boldaji MA, Abdollahi MH, Kadivar P, Hasan Abadi HR, Arjomandnia A. The Effectiveness of Computer-based Cognitive Training on WorkingMemory on Attention, Response Control, and Central Executive of Working Memory of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities. Soc Cogn 2018; 7(2): 173-86. [in Persian]
56. Abbariky A, Yazdanbakhsh K, Momeni k. The effectiveness of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation on reducing cognitive failure in students with learning disability. Q Psychol Except Individ 2017; 7(26): 127-57. [in Persian]
57. Khosrotash P, Abolmaali Alhosseini K, Hashemian k. The comparison of the effect of executive function training and social emotional training on the performance of continuous attention in in students with mathematical learning disability in elementary schools. JPE 2017; 7(27): 79-113. [in Persian]
58. Hossein Khanzadeh AA, Latif Zanjani M, Taher M. Comparison of the Effectiveness Computer-Assisted Cognitive Remediation (CACR) and Multi-Sensory Method on Improvement Reading Performance of Students with Dyslexia. J New Thoughts Educ 2020; 15(4): 71-94. [in Persian]
59. Bayrami M, Movahedi Y, Ansari S. The effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation treatment on the performance of problem solving in patients with disabilities learn math. Shenakht J Psychol Psychiatry 2018; 4(4): 24-33. [in Persian]
60. Zare H, Amini F. The effectiveness of working memory training software on attention functions of students with mathematics learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 2016; 6(1): 60-79 . [in Persian]
61. Baezzat F, Leila F. The Efficacy of Problem-Solving Assistant Training Software on Improvement of Problem-Solving Skills among Elementary School Students with Mathematics Disorder. JCMH 2015; 2(1): 59-69. [in Persian]
62. Zolfi V, Rezaei A. The Effect of Working Memory Computer Assisted Intervention on Mathematics Anxiety, Working Memory and Performanceing Mathematics among Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities. JINEV 2015; 8(30): 75-86. [in Persian]
63. Poushaneh K, Sharifi A, Motamed-Yeganeh N. The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation computer based intervention on executive function and working memory in children with math disorder. JPE 2015; 5(20): 141-59. [in Persian]
64. Shokoohi M, Yekta, Lotfi S, Rostami R, Arjmandnia AA, Motamed N, et al. The effectiveness of computerized cognitive training on the working memory performance of children with dyslexia. AVR 2014; 23(3): 46-56. [in Persian]
65. SoltaniKouhbanani S, Alizadeh H, Hashemi J, Sarami G, SoltaniKouhbanani S. The effectiveness of computer-aided working memory training on improvement of executive functions and math performances in students with mathematics disorder. JPE 2013; 3(11): 1-20. [in Persian]
66. Safari N, Baezzat F, Ghaffari M. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation program on attention dimensions and reading efficacy in students with dyslexia. JCMH 2020; 7(3): 167-81. [in Persian]
67. Demehri F, Darvishi E, Saedmanesh M. Effectiveness of Motor Based Cognitive Rehabilitation on Orientation, Learning Memory, Attention, and Cognition in Children with Non-verbal Learning Disorder. J Rehabil Med 2020; 9(2): 249-56. [in Persian]
68. Enayatzadeh S, Hasanzadeh R, Emadian S O. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Rehabilitation Training and Vestibular Stimulation on Neuropsychological Characteristics of Children with Specific Learning Disorder. IJPN 2020; 8(4): 88-98. [in Persian]
69. Sivoshifar N, Tajalli P, Sharyat Bagheri M. Comparison the effect of Dovson-Guare program and Metacognitive processes education on executive functioning (attention, working memory, and behavioral inhibition) of students with dyslexia. JPE 2020; 10(37): 1-19. [in Persian]
70. Rahnama F, Beyazi MH, Rajaei A, Khoeinejad G. Comparison of the Effect of Neuropsychological Therapy, Rhythmic Mvements and Cognitive Empowerment on the Executive Functions of Students with Specific learning Disorder. IJPN 2020; 8(1). [in Persian]
71. Dehghani Y, Moradi N. The Effectiveness of Working Memory Training on Planning and Flexibility of Students with Specific Learning Disability (Dyslexia). Neuropsychology 2020; 6(1): 101-20. [in Persian]
72. Hasanvand M, Arjmandnia AA. The effect of cognitive games on cognitive flexibility in children with mathematical disorders. Shenakht J Psychol Psychiatry 2019; 6(2): 134-48. [in Persian]
73. Ghasemi S, Arjmandnia AA, Gholamali Lavasani M. Designing family-based cognitive rehabilitation package and evaluating its effectiveness on executive functions of dyslexic students. CECIRANJ 2019; 10(2): 200-15. [in Persian]
74. Barghi E, Estaki M, Salehi M. The Effectiveness of Teaching Cognitive Ability to Verbal and Non-verbal working memory of students with dyslexia. JPE 2019; 9(34): 159-81. [in Persian]
75. Arjmandnia AA, Asgharinekah M. The Effect of Cognitive Games on Attention and Response Inhibition in Students with Dyscalculia. J Except Child 2018; 18(1): 5-18. [in Persian]
76. Sadeghi A, Zainali S, Foroughi Z. The Effect of Cognitive Skills Training on the Performance and Cognitive Abilities of Children with Learning Disabilities. J Learn Disabil 2019; 8(2): 38-57. [in Persian]
77. Soleimani E. The effectiveness of cognitive remediation on cognitiveâ Attention functions in students with specific learning disorder. CPAP 2020; 15(1): 63-72. [in Persian]
78. Dehghan N, Farmarzi S, Nadi M-A, Arefi M. Investigating the Effectiveness of Educational Package of Cognitive Plays on Performance of Neuropsychological Skills of Dyslexic Students. Neuropsychology 2017; 3(9): 67-86. [in Persian]
79. Yarmohammadian A, Ghamarani A, Seifi Z, Arfa M. Effectiveness of cognitive strategies training on memory, reading performance and speed of information processing in students with dyslexia. J Learn Disabil 2015; 4(4): 101-17. [in Persian]
80. Ghalamzan S, Malekpour M, Faramarzi S. Effectiveness of Attention-oriented Games on Memory Performance and Learning of Preschool Children with Learning Neuropsychological Disabilities. CPAP 2015; 12(2): 3-10. [in Persian]
81. Haidich AB. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia 2010; 14(Suppl 1): 29.
82. Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, et al. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288(18): 2271-81.
83. Corbett A, Owen A, Hampshire A, Grahn J, Stenton R, Dajani S, et al. The effect of an online cognitive training package in healthy older adults: an online randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16(11): 990-7.
84. Belleville S, Hudon C, Bier N, Brodeur C, Gilbert B, Grenier S, et al. MEMO+: efficacy, durability and effect of cognitive training and psychosocial intervention in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66(4): 655-63.
85. Kelly ME, Loughrey D, Lawlor BA, Robertson IH, Walsh C, Brennan S. The impact of cognitive training and mental stimulation on cognitive and everyday functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2014; 15: 28-43.
86. Kesler SR, Lacayo NJ, Jo B. A pilot study of an online cognitive rehabilitation program for executive function skills in children with cancer-related brain injury. Brain Inj 2011; 25(1): 101-12.
87. Katz LJ, Goldstein G, Beers SR. Learning disabilities in older adolescents and adults. Clinical utility of the neuropsychological perspective. 2001.
88. [88] Pumaccahua TT, Wong EH, Wiest DJ. Effects of computerized cognitive training on working memory in a school setting. IJLTER 2017; 16(3): 88-104.
89. Avtzon SA. Effect of neuroscience-based cognitive skill training on growth of cognitive deficits associated with learning disabilities in children Grades 2–4. Walden Uni; 2012.
90. Baune BT, Fuhr M, Air T, Hering C. Neuropsychological functioning in adolescents and young adults with major depressive disorder--a review. Psychiatry Res 2014; 218(3): 261-71.
91. Hasselbalch BJ, Knorr U, Kessing LV. Cognitive impairment in the remitted state of unipolar depressive disorder: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2011; 134(1-3): 20-31.
92. Trivedi MH, Greer TL. Cognitive dysfunction in unipolar depression: implications for treatment. J Affect Disord 2014; 152: 19-27.
93. Schmid MT, Hammar Å. A follow-up study of first episode major depressive disorder. Impairment in inhibition and semantic fluency—potential predictors for relapse?. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 633.
94. Porter RJ, Bowie CR, Jordan J, Malhi GS. Cognitive remediation as a treatment for major depression: a rationale, review of evidence and recommendations for future research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2013; 47(12): 1165-75.
95. Preiss M, Shatil E, Cermakova R, Cimermannova D, Flesher I. Personalized cognitive training in unipolar and bipolar disorder: a study of cognitive functioning. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 108.
96. Ranjbar M, Hassanzadeh S, Arjmandniya AA. The effectiveness of computerized cognitive rehabilitation on children’s executive function: Systematic review on national studies. Adv Cogn Psychol 2020; 22(1): 128-36. [in Persian]
97. Shah TM, Weinborn M, Verdile G, Sohrabi HR, Martins RN. Enhancing cognitive functioning in healthy older adults: a systematic review of the clinical significance of commercially available computerized cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline. Neuropsychol Rev 2017; 27(1): 62-80.
98. Gates NJ, Vernooij RW, Di Nisio M, Karim S, March E, Martinez G, et al. Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; (3).
99. [99] Man DW, Chung JC, Lee GY. Evaluation of a virtual reality‐based memory training programme for Hong Kong Chinese older adults with questionable dementia: a pilot study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 27(5): 513-20.
100. Gates N, Valenzuela M. Cognitive exercise and its role in cognitive function in older adults. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2010; 12(1): 20-7.
101. Kueider AM, Parisi JM, Gross AL, Rebok GW. Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review. PloS one 2012; 7(7): e40588.
102. Owen AM, Hampshire A, Grahn JA, Stenton R, Dajani S, Burns AS, et al. Putting brain training to the test. Nature 2010; 465(7299): 775-8.
103. Jak AJ, Seelye AM, Jurick SM. Crosswords to computers: a critical review of popular approaches to cognitive enhancement. Neuropsychol Rev 2013; 23(1): 13-26.
104. Ko EJ, Sung IY, Yuk JS, Jang DH, Yun G. A tablet computer-based cognitive training program for young children with cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine 2020; 99(12).
105. Kosta-Tsolaki M, Poptsi E, Aggogiatou C, Kounti F, Zafeiropoulos S, Markou N. Computer-based cognitive training versus paper and pencil training: which is more effective? A randomized controlled trial in people with mild cognitive impairment. JSM Alzheimer's Dis Related Dementia 2017; 4(IKEEART-2018-1153): 1032-.
106. Sala G, Gobet F. Cognitive training does not enhance general cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2019; 23(1): 9-20.
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله
نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:

CAPTCHA



XML   English Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shabanali-Fami F, Ghasemzadeh S, Nejati S. The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation (computer-based and classic) interventions on cognitive functions of children with specific learning disorder in Iran: A meta-analytic study. Feyz 2022; 26 (2) :166-183
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-4511-fa.html

شعبانعلی فمی فائزه، قاسم زاده سوگند، نجاتی سمیه. اثربخشی مداخلات توان‌بخشی شناختی (مبتنی‌بر رایانه و کلاسیک) بر عملکرد شناختی کودکان مبتلا به اختلال یادگیری خاص در ایران: یک مطالعه فراتحلیل. مجله علوم پزشکی فيض. 1401; 26 (2) :166-183

URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-4511-fa.html



Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
دوره 26، شماره 2 - ( دوماه نامه 1401 ) برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 46 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645