[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 23, Issue 4 (Bimonthly 2019) ::
Feyz 2019, 23(4): 433-441 Back to browse issues page
Investigation of the effect of educational program based on the removal of barriers on knowledge and intention to do peritoneal dialysis in the patients with end-stage renal disease in Akhavan Hospital, Kashan
Maliheh Salehi , Mansour Dianti * , Hossein Ali Mehrabi , Esmaeil Azizi-Fini
Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, I.R. Iran. , mandianati@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1117 Views)
Background: Despite the passing of many years of introduction of peritoneal dialysis as a replacement therapy for renal function, the rate of acceptance of this method is still low. This study aimed to determine the effect of educational program based on the removal of barrierson knowledge and intention to do peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Materials and Methods: In a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test study, 45 patients with peritoneal dialysis who had criteria for entering the study were selected in a purposive sampling method. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire. After the sampling, an educational program based on the removal reported barriers in the research background was presented to the subjects. The program was presented individually and mainly in a 60- to 75-minute session. The results were analyzed by paired t-test and McNemar test.
Results According to the results of this study, the implementation of educational program based on removal of barriers significantly increased the knowledge of patients about peritoneal dialysis (P<0.01). Although the prevalence of patients with peritoneal dialysis increased in the post-test phase, the results showed that this increase was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Providing an educational program based on removal of barriers can increase knowledge of the patients about the peritoneal dialysis in the short term. In order to increase their willingness and practical intention to perform this type of dialysis, long-term interventions at the hospital and family levels are required.
Keywords: Peritoneal dialysis, Barrier-based education, Knowledge, Peritoneal dialysis intention
Full-Text [PDF 251 kb]   (353 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2018/10/29 | Accepted: 2019/06/2 | Published: 2019/09/30
1. U.S. department of Health and Human Services. Treatment Methods for Kidney Failure Peritoneal Dialysis National Institute of Health, Internet. National Kidney and Urologic diseases Information Clearinghouse. NIH Publication. 2006. available at: www.niddk.nih.gov.
2. Iran Consortium Dialysis. Yearbook Dialysis Iran. Tehran. 2016. [in Persian]
3. Monfared A, Khosravi K. The assessment of ESRD causesin hemodialysis patient in Gilan. Gilan Univ Med Sci J 2003; 12(46): 76-82. [in Persian]
4. Mercado-Martinez FJ, Correa-Mauricio ME. Living in hemodialysis without social insurance: The voices of renal sick people and their families. Salud Publica Mex 2015; 57(2): 155-60. [in Persian]
5. Heidari Gorji MA, Davanloo AA, Heidarigorji AM. The efficacy of relaxation training on stress, anxiety, and pain perception in hemodialysis patients. Indian J Nephrol 2014; 24(6): 356-61.
6. Manouras AJ, Kekis PB, Stamou KM, Konstadoulakis MM, Apostolidis NS. Laparoscopic placement of Oreopoulos-Zellerman catheters in CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24: 252-5.
7. Chen CK, Tsai YC, Hsu HJ, Wu IW, Sun CY, Chou CC, et al. Depression and suicide risk in hemodialysis patients with chronic renal failure. Psychosomatics 2010; 51(6): 528-.e6.
8. Zhang Ai-Hua, LI-Tao Cheng, Ning Zhu. Comparison of quality of life of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in China. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007; 5:49.
9. Mau LW, Chiu HC, Chang PY, Hwang SC, Hwang SJ. Health-related quality of life in Taiwanese dialysis patients: effects of dialysis modality. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008; 24: 453-60.
10. Theofilou P. Quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis treatment. J Clin Med Res 2011; 19; 3(3): 132-8.
11. François K, Bargman JM. Evaluating the benefits of home-based peritoneal dialysis. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2014; 7: 447.
12. Blake PG, Quinn RR, Oliver MJ. Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection. Perit Dial Int 2013; 33(3): 233-41.
13. McLaughlin K, Manns B, Mortis G, Hons R, Taub K. Why patients with ESRD do not select self-care dialysis as a treatment option. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41(2): 380-5.
14. Marrón B, Ocana JM, Salgueira M, Barril G, Lamas JM, Martín M, et al. Analysis of patient flow into dialysis: role of education in choice of dialysis modality. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25(3): S56-9.
15. Gaarden MW, Van de L, Noordzij M, Stel VS, Ravani P, Jarraya F, et al. Effects of comorbid and demographic factors on dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 16: 845.
16. Chanouzas D, Ng KP, Fallouh B, Baharani J. What influences patient choice of treatmentmodality at the pre-dialysis stage?. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27(4): 1542-7.
17. Afshar M, Sabbaghian E. The effect of educational package on recurrence and severity of bleeding in patients with epistaxis. Feyz 2018; 22(6): 610-6. [in Persian]
18. McLaughlin K, Jones H, VanderStraeten C, Mills C, Visser M, Taub K, et al. Why do patients choose self-care dialysis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23(12): 3972-6.
19. Oliver MJ, Garg AX, Blake PG, Johnson JF, Verrelli M, Zacharias JM, et al. Impact of contraindications, barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25(8): 2737-44.
20. Ribitsch W, Haditsch B, Otto R, Schilcher G, Quehenberger F, Roob JM, et al. Effects of a pre-dialysis patient education program on the relative frequencies of dialysis modalities. Perit Dial Int 2013; 33(4): 367-71.
21. Devoe DJ, Wong B, James MT, Ravani P, Oliver MJ, Barnieh L, et al. Patient Education and Peritoneal Dialysis Modality Selection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 26: 122-9.
22. Chiang PC, Hou JJ, Jong IC, Hung PH, Hsiao CY, Ma TL, et al. Factors Associated with the Choice of Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2(16):
23. Wasse H. Factors related to patient selection and initiation of peritoneal dialysis. J Vascular Access 2017; 18(1): 39-44.
24. Habib A, Durand AC, Brunet P, Duval-Sabatier A, Moranne O, Bataille S, et al. Facteurs influençant le choix de la dialyse péritonéale: le point de vue des patients et des néphrologues. Néphrologie Thérapeutique 2017; 13(2): 93-102.
25. Lobbedez T, Verger C, Ryckelynck JP, Fabre E, Evans D. Is assisted peritoneal dialysis associated with technique survival when competing events are considered? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 7(4): 612-8.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Salehi M, Dianti M, Mehrabi H A, Azizi-Fini E. Investigation of the effect of educational program based on the removal of barriers on knowledge and intention to do peritoneal dialysis in the patients with end-stage renal disease in Akhavan Hospital, Kashan. Feyz. 2019; 23 (4) :433-441
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3733-en.html

Volume 23, Issue 4 (Bimonthly 2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی پژوهشی فیض ::: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان KAUMS Journal ( FEYZ )
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.03 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4311