[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Guide for Authors::
Online Submission::
Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
::
Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
enamad
..
:: Volume 24, Issue 1 (Bimonthly 2020) ::
Feyz 2020, 24(1): 99-108 Back to browse issues page
Editing and psychometrics of the death attitude tool and its association with organ donation after brain death: based on structural equation model
Farzad Abbasi , Mohammad Ganji , Seyyed Kamaladdin Mousavi
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kashan, Kashan, I.R. Iran. , M.ganji@kashanu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2076 Views)
Background: In the modern age, with its increasing reflexivity, death has changed to technical issue, its quality is left to the medical profession, so a new definition of death is introduced as brain death and the possibility of organ transplantation. Therefore, this article aimed to investigate death attitudes and its relationship with organ donation.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study examined 475 people over the age of 20 years in Kashan in September 2017 using a population-based random sampling method. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire based on Giddens' theory of late modernity. Data analysis is based on correlation and structural equation design using SPSS and AMOS software.
Results: Among the five dimensions of belief to death, natural belief, with the acceptance of death as the end of life and an inevitable reality as a result of rethinking, awareness of death, medical advances and confidence in experts of the field among the five dimensions of belief to death, had the highest average (3.77 out of 5) and were the most important explanatory variables for both religious (β=0.35, P<0.001) and scientific (β=0.33, P<0.001) dimensions to the organ donation. Model fit indices, Absolute (RMSEA=0.03) Comparative (CFI=0.92) Parsimonious (PRATIO=0.58), showed that the collected data supported the conceptual model well.
Conclusion: The designed tools had good validity and reliability and structural equation showed that organ donation entails the acceptance of death and some kind of trust since in the case of denying the death with either theme of fear or avoidance, the individual cannot accept the organ donation.
Keywords: Attitude to death, Brain death, Organ donation, Trust, Awareness
Full-Text [PDF 550 kb]   (553 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2019/09/17 | Revised: 2020/05/16 | Accepted: 2020/01/27 | Published: 2020/05/16
References
1. Abbasi Dolatabadi Z, Farahani B, Fesharaki M, Najafizadeh K. Effect of education about brain death and organ donation on attitude and knowledge of nursing students. IJCCN 2010; 3(3): 109-12.
2. Citerio G, Cypel M, Dobb GJ, Dominguez-Gil B, Frontera JA, Greer DM, et al. Organ donation in adults: a critical care perspective. ICM J 2016; 42(3):305-15.‬
3. nternational Center for Donation and Transplantation, Last updated: 19-06-2017. Available at: www.irodat.org
4. Iranian Society of Organ Donation, Last updated: 23-09-2017. Available at: https://ehda.center/showPost/statistics.
5. Daaleman TP, Dobbs D. Religiosity, spirituality, and death attitudes in chronically ill older adults. ROA J 2010; 32(2): 224-43.
6. Giddenz A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991.
7. Berger P, Luckmann, T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Penguin Books; 1976.
8. Wessel EM, Garon M. Introducing reflective narratives into palliative care home care education. Home Health Nurse 2005; 23: 516–22.
9. Henrie J, Patrick JH. Religiousness, religious doubt, and death anxiety. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2014; 78 (3): 203-27.
10. Kamyab Mansori Y, Dolatian M, Shams J, Nasiri M. Relationship between Death Anxiety and Spiritual Well-Being in Patients with Gynecologic Cancer. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2017; 27(2): 28-34.
11. Sinoff G. Thanatophobia (Death anxiety) in the elderly: the problem of the Childs inability to assess their own parents' death anxiety state. J Geriatric Med 2017; 4: 1-5.
12. Inglehart R. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Translated by Maryam Vatar,Tehran: Kavir Publication; 2003.
13. Habermas J. The Future of Human Nature, Translated by Yahya Emami, Tehran: Vangar Publication; 2005.
14. Fritjof C. The Hidden Connections .Translated by Mohammad Hariri Akbari, Tehran: Ney Publication; 2007.
15. Hallam E, Jenny H, Glennys H. Beyond the Body, Death and Social Identity, London: Routledge; 2005.
16. Seraj Zadeh SH. The challenges of religion and modernity, Tehran: Tarh-e-No; 2007.‬
17. Slomka J. The Negotiation of Death: Clinical Decision Making at the End of Life, Soc Sci Med 1992; 35(3): 251-59.
18. Martin Ch, Solvey S. Death Attitudes and self – reported health relevant behaviors. J Health Pscyol 1996, 1(4): 441-53.
19. Amy Hui-Mei HL. Factors Related to Attitudes toward Death among American and Chinese Older Adults. OMEGA J Death Dying 2003; 47(1): 157-70.
20. Deborah CA. Good death for whom? Quality of Spouses death and psychological distress among older widowed persons. J Health Soc Behav 2003; 44: 215–32.
21. Daaleman, TP, Dobbs, D. Religiosity, Spirituality, and Death Attitudes in Chronically III Older Adults. ROA J 2010; 32(2): 224-43.
22. Giddenz A. Capitalism and modern social theory, Cambridge: University Press; 1971.
23. Glock CY, Stark R. The Dimensions of Religiosity: Religion and Society in Tension, Chicago: Rand McNally; 1971.
24. Lawshe CH. A Qualitative Approach to Content Validity. Pers Psychol 1975; 28(4): 563-75.
25. Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2013.
26. Hair JF, Black W.C., Babin B.K., Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. New York: Pearson; 2010.
27. Polit FD, Beck TC, Owen VS. Isthe CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. J Res Nurs Health 2007; 30: 459-67.
28. Ghasemi V. Structural equation modeling in social researches using amos graphics. Tehran: Jammeeshenasan Press; 2010.
29. Byrne, Barbara M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming, Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group; 2009.
30. Norbert E. Loneliness of the Dying, Translated by Omid Mehregan and Najafi,S,Tehran: Gam-e-No Publication; 2017.
31. Seale C. Construction Death: the sociology of dying and bereavement, Cambridge: University press; 1998.
32. Dezutter J, Soenens B, Hutsebaut D. Religiosity and mental health: a further exploration of the relative importance of religious behaviors vs. religious attitudes. Pers Individ Differ 2009; 40(4): 807-18.
33. Walter T. The Sociology of Death. Sociol Compass 2008; 2(1): 317–36.
34. Walter T. Facing death without tradition, in Glennys Howarth and Peter Jupp (eds), Contemporary Issues in the Sociology of Death, Dying and Disposal: Palgrave Macmillan; 1996.
35. Kellehear A. A Social History of Dying. U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
36. Long, S.O. Cultural scripts for a good death in Japan and United states: similarities and differences, Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 913-28.
37. Ariès PH. Western attitudes toward death: from the Middle Ages to the present, Translated by Mohammad Javad Abdollahi, Tehran: Elm Publication; 2013.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbasi F, Ganji M, Mousavi S K. Editing and psychometrics of the death attitude tool and its association with organ donation after brain death: based on structural equation model. Feyz 2020; 24 (1) :99-108
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3974-en.html


Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
Volume 24, Issue 1 (Bimonthly 2020) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 46 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645