|
1. Kahana T, Hiss J. Identification of human remains: forensic radiology. J Clin Forensic Med 1997; 4(1): 7-15. 2. Poonia DS, Gupta DS, Choudhary DP, Verma DMJIMJoH. Sex determination using mastoid process measurements of dry skull bone: A Descriptive Analysis. Int Multispecialty J Health 2016; 2(10): 17-21. 3. Krogman W, Ican M. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1986. 4. Bidmos M, Gibbon V, Štrkalj G. Recent advances in sex determination of human skeletal remains in South Africa. South Africa J Sci 2010; 106(11-12): 29-34. 5. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. An osteometric study of northern Indian populations for sexual dimorphism in craniofacial region. J Forensic Sci 2011; 56(3): 700-5. 6. Steyn M, Işcan MY. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 1998; 98(1-2): 9-16. 7. Kim DI, Lee U, Han SH. Sex determination using three-dimensional image of skull in Korean: Metric study by discriminant function analysis. Korean J Phys Anthropol 2015; 28(2): 103-18. 8. Ekizoglu O, Hocaoglu E, Inci E, Can IO, Solmaz D, Aksoy S, et al. Assessment of sex in a modern Turkish population using cranial anthropometric parameters. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2016; 21: 45-52. 9. Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE, Kenyhercz MWJIjolm. Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South Africans. Int J Legal Med 2015; 129(4): 869-75. 10. Akhlaghi MI, Salavati MA. Mandibulo-Canine index value for sex identification. J Tehran Univ Med J 2008; 65(12): 66-71. 11. Meysamie A, Taee F, Mohammadi-Vajari MA, Yoosefi-Khanghah S, Emamzadeh-Fard S, Abbassi M, et al. Sample size calculation on web, can we rely on the results? J Med Stat Inform 2014; 2(1): 3. 12. Akansel G, Inan N, Kurtas O, Sarisoy HT, Arslan A, Demirci A. Gender and the lateral angle of the internal acoustic canal meatus as measured on computerized tomography of the temporal bone. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 178 (2-3): 93–5. 13. Morgan JA. Sex determination using the petrous portion of the temporal bone: A validation study of three cranial techniques using computed tomography (CT) scans. Folia Med Cracoviensia Vol. LV, 2, 2015: 33–9. 14. Norén A, Lynnerup N, Czarnetzki A, Graw M. Lateral angle: a method for sexing using the petrous bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005; 128(2): 318-23. 15. Steyn M, Işcan MY. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 1998; 98(1-2): 9-16. 16. Nagaoka T, Shizushima A, Sawada J, Tomo S, Hoshino K, Sato H, et al. Sex determination using mastoid process measurements: standards for Japanese human skeletons of the medieval and early modern periods. Anthropol Sci 2008; 116(2): 105-13. 17. Lynnerup N. Cranial thickness in relation to age, sex and general body build in a Danish forensic sample. Forensic Sci Int 2001; 117(1-2): 45-51. 18. Schulte-Geers C, Obert M, Schilling RL, Harth S, Traupe H, Gizewski ER, et al. Age and gender-dependent bone density changes of the human skull disclosed by high-resolution flat-panel computed tomography. Int J Legal Med 2011; 125(3): 417–25. 19. Ikeda T, Nakamura M, Itoh M. Sex differences in the zygomatic angle in Japanese patients analyzed by MRI with reference to moire fringe patterns. Aesth Plast Surg 1999; 23(5): 349-53.
|
.png){kind=logo}
