[صفحه اصلی ]   [Archive] [ English ]  
:: صفحه اصلي :: درباره مجله :: شماره جاری :: تمام شماره‌ها :: جستجو :: ثبت نام :: ارسال مقاله :: تماس با ما ::
بخش‌های اصلی
صفحه اصلی::
اطلاعات نشریه::
بانک‌ها و نمایه‌ها::
آرشیو مجله و مقالات::
برای نویسندگان::
اخلاق در پژوهش::
برای داوران::
تسهیلات پایگاه::
تماس با ما::
::
Basic and Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
..
DOAJ
..
CINAHL
..
EBSCO
..
IMEMR
..
ISC
..
جستجو در پایگاه

جستجوی پیشرفته
..
دریافت اطلاعات پایگاه
نشانی پست الکترونیک خود را برای دریافت اطلاعات و اخبار پایگاه، در کادر زیر وارد کنید.
..
enamad
..
:: دوره 23، شماره 1 - ( دوماه نامه 1398 ) ::
جلد 23 شماره 1 صفحات 101-89 برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
رابطه سبک دلبستگی و پریشانی روان شناختی باتوجه به نقش واسطه ای ذهن آگاهی
فاطمه اخوان عبیری ، محمدرضا شعیری ، محمد غلامی فشارکی
دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران ، sharirigm@gmail.com
چکیده:   (6454 مشاهده)
سابقه و هدف: پژوهش ­های مختلف رابطه بین پریشانی روان­شناختی و متغیرهای متفاوتی را مورد مطالعه قرار داده­اند. هدف پژوهش حاضر پیش­بینی تغییرات پریشانی روان­شناختی منطبق بر سبک دلبستگی با عنایت به نقش واسطه­ ای ذهن­ آگاهی ­است.
مواد و روش ­ها: پژوهش حاضر پیرو طرحی از مطالعات همبستگی می­ باشد. نمونه تحقیق، 250 نفر از دانشجویان کارشناسی و دکتری حرفه ­ای دانشگاه شاهد را در بر داشت که در نیم­سال نخست سال تحصیلی 97-1396 مشغول به ­تحصیل بودند. جهت سنجش متغیرهای پژوهش، از مقیاس اضطراب، افسردگی و استرس (DASS-21)، پرسشنامه تجارب مربوط به روابط نزدیک (ECR-R) و پرسشنامه پنج­ وجهی ذهن ­آگاهی (FFMQ) استفاده شد.  
نتایج: یافته­ ها بیان­گر وجود رابطه مثبت و معنادار بین اضطراب دلبستگی و مؤلفه ­های پریشانی روان­شناختی (اضطراب، افسردگی و استرس) و همچنین رابطه منفی و معنادار بین اضطراب دلبستگی و ­ذهن­ آگاهی بود. بین ذهن­ آگاهی و مؤلفه ­های پریشانی روان­شناختی و نیز بین اجتناب دلبستگی و ذهن­آگاهی رابطه منفی و معنادار به­ دست آمد. یافته­ های برآمده از معادلات ساختاری نقش واسطه ­ای متغیر ذهن­آگاهی را در رابطه بین اضطراب دلبستگی و مؤلفه­ های پریشانی روان­شناختی تأیید نمود. تأثیر اجتناب دلبستگی بر مؤلفه های پریشانی روان­شناختی تنها در حضور ذهن ­آگاهی به­ عنوان متغیر واسطه ­ای، و نه به ­صورت مستقیم، تأیید گردید.
نتیجه­ گیری: در مجموع می ­توان گفت در تأثیر اضطراب دلبستگی و اجتناب دلبستگی بر مؤلفه­ های پریشانی روان­شناختی، ذهن­ آگاهی نقش واسطه­ دارد. به ­نظر می­ رسد این یافته­ ها در حوزه­ های مختلفی چون روابط بین­­ فردی، تربیتی، خانوادگی و درمانی کاربرد داشته­ باشد.
واژه‌های کلیدی: دلبستگی، پریشانی روانشناختی، ذهن آگاهی، مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری.
متن کامل [PDF 1018 kb]   (1829 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: عمومى
دریافت: 1397/6/18 | ویرایش نهایی: 1398/2/25 | پذیرش: 1397/11/3 | انتشار: 1398/1/28
فهرست منابع
1. Ohayashi H, Yamada S. Psychological distress: symptoms, causes, and coping. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2012.
2. Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Lichter AS, Nied‌er‌huber JE. Clinical Oncology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
3. Cheng Y, Guo YL, Yeh WY. A national survey of psychosocial job stressors and their implications for health among working people in Taiwan. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2001; 74(7): 495-504.
4. Nakao M, Yamanaka G, Kuboki T. Suicidal ideation and somatic symptoms of patients with mind/body distress in a Japanese psychosomatic clinic. Suicide and Life-Threat Behav 2002; 32(1): 80-90.
5. Nakao M, Yano E. Prediction of major dep‌ression in Japanese adults: somatic manifestation of depression in annual health examinations. J Affect Disord 2006; 90(1): 29-35.
6. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1982; 52(4): 664-78.
7. Cassidy J, Shaver PR. Handbook of Attachment. New York: Guilford; 1999.
8. Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR. Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. New York: Guilford; 1998.
9. Simpson JA, Rholes WS, Oriña MM, Grich J. Working models of attachment, support giving, and support seeking in a stressful situation. J Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2002; 28(5): 598-608.
10. Kobak RR, Sceery A. Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. J Child Devel 1988; 1: 135-46.
11. Wei M, Heppner PP, Mallinckrodt B. Perce‌ived coping as a mediator between attachment and psychological distress: A structural equation modeling approach. J Couns Psychol 2003; 50(4): 438-47.
12. Frey LL, Beesley D, Miller MR. Relational health, attachment, and psychological distress in college women and men. Psychol Women Quarterly 2006; 30(3): 303-11.
13. Mallinckrodt B, Wei M. Attachment, social com‌petencies, social support, and psychological distress. J Couns Psychol 2005; 52(3): 358-67.
14. Turan N, Erdur-Baker Ö. The contribution of rumination and internal working models of atta‌chment to psychological symptoms. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 2010; 1(5): 1185-9.
15. Zhu W, Wang CD, Chong CC. Adult atta‌chment, perceived social support, cultural orien‌tation, and depressive symptoms: A moderated mediation model. J Couns Psychol 2016; 63(6): 645-55.
16. Körük S, Öztürk A, Kara A. The Predictive Strength of Perceived Parenting and Parental Attachment Styles on Psychological Symptoms among Turkish University Students. Int J Instr‌uction 2016; 9(2): 215-30.
17. McDonald HM, Sherman KA, Petocz P, Kangas M, Grant KA, Kasparian NA. Mindfulness and the experience of psychological distress: the mediating effects of emotion regulation and attachment anxiety. J Mindfulness 2016; 7(4): 799-808.
18. Rahimian Bugar E, Noori A, Oreizi, HR, Mowlavi H, Foroughi Mobarakeh A. Relationship between adulthood attachment styles and job satis‌faction and stress in nurses. Psychiat Clin Psychol Iran 2007; 13(2): 148-57. [in Persian]
19. Nayebi Nia AS, Salari P, Modarres Gheravi M. Investigating the relationship between adult attachment to parents with stress, anxiety and depression. J Prince Mental Health 2011; 13(2): 194-202. [in Persian]
20. Buller CJ. Dispositional Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation as Mediators of Attachment and Psychological Distress Relationship [Doctoral Dissertation]. Sydney: University of Newcastle; 2015.73p.
21. Pickard JA, Caputi P, Grenyer BF. Mindfu‌lness and emotional regulation as sequential media‌tors in the relationship between attachment security and depression. J Pers Indiv Dif 2016; 99: 179-83.
22. Crane R. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: Distinctive features. London: Routledge; 2017.
23. Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment 2004; 11(3): 191-206.
24. Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003; 84(4): 822.
25. Rosenzweig S, Reibel DK, Greeson JM, Brainard GC, Hojat M. Mindfulness-based stress reduction lowers psychological distress in medical students. J Teach Learn Med 2003; 15(2): 88-92.
26. Carmody J, Baer RA. Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction prog‌ram. J Behav Med 2008; 31(1): 23-33.
27. Coffey KA, Hartman M. Mechanisms of action in the inverse relationship between mindfulness and psychological distress. Compl Health Pract Rev 2008; 13(2): 79-91.
28. Beddoe AE, Yang CP, Kennedy HP, Weiss SJ, Lee KA. The effects of mindfulness-based yoga during pregnancy on maternal psychological and physical distress. J Obst Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2009; 38(3): 310-9.
29. Sanders WA, Lam DH. Ruminative and mind‌ful self-focused processing modes and their impact on problem solving in dysphoric individuals. J Behav Res Ther 2010; 48(8): 747-53.
30. Schütze R, Rees C, Preece M, Schütze M. Low mindfulness predicts pain catastrophizing in a fear-avoidance model of chronic pain. J Pain 2010; 148(1): 120-7.
31. Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA, Oh D. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. J Cons Clin Psychol 2010; 78(2): 169-83.
32. Bajaj B, Robins RW, Pande N. Mediating role of self-esteem on the relationship between mind‌fulness, anxiety, and depression. J Pers Individ Dif 2016; 96: 127-31.
33. Pepping CA, O’Donovan A, Davis PJ. The differential relationship between mindfulness and attachment in experienced and inexperienced meditators. J Mindfulness 2014; 5(4): 392-9.
34. Caldwell JG, Shaver PR. Promoting attach‌me‌nt-‌related mindfulness and compassion: A wait-list-controlled study of women who were mistreated during childhood. J Mindfulness 2015; 6(3): 624-36.
35. Saavedra MC, Chapman KE, Rogge RD. Clarifying links between attachment and relationship quality: Hostile conflict and mindfulness as moderators. J Family Psychol 2010; 24(4): 380-90.
36. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. J Educ Psychol Meas 1970; 30(3): 607-10.
37. Arefi M, Navvabi Nezhad S, Shafi’ Abadi A, KiamaneshAR. Attachment styles, sex, merrietal satisfaction. Educ Res J Islamic Azad University of Bojnourd Branch 2012; 31: 117-32. [in Persian]
38. Fraley RC, Waller NG, Brennan KA. An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 78(2): 350-65.
39. Fraley RC. Information on the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) adult attach‌ment questionnaire. Self-Report Measures of Adult Attachment 2005. Available at: http://www.psych.‌uiu‌c.edu/~rc-fraley/measures/ecrr.htm.
40. Rotaru TŞ, Rusu A. Psychometric properties of the Romanian version of Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-R). Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 2013; 78: 51-5.
41. Panaghi L, Maleki G, Zabih Zadeh A, Psht Mohammadi M, Soltani Nezhad Z. Validity, relia‌bility and factorial structure of Experiences in Close Relationship (ECR). J Psychiatr Clin Psychol Iran 2013; 4(19): 305-13. [in Persian]
42. Goodall K, Trejnowska A, Darling S. The relationship between dispositional mindfulness, attachment security and emotion regulation. J Pers Individ Dif 2012; 52(5): 622-6.
43. Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. J Assessment 2006; 13(1): 27-45.
44. Walach H, Buchheld N, Buttenmüller V, Kleinknecht N, Schmidt S. Measuring mindf‌ulness the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). J Pers Individ Dif 2006; 40(8): 1543-55.
45. Feldman G, Hayes A, Kumar S, Greeson J, Laur‌e‌nceau JP. Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2007; 29(3): 177-90.
46. Chadwick P, Hember M, Symes J, Peters E, Kuipers E, Dagnan D. Responding mindfully to unpl‌e‌asant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness quest‌ion‌naire (SMQ). British J Clin Psychol 2008; 47(4): 451-5.
47. Cebolla A, García-Palacios A, Soler J, Guillen V, Baños R, Botella C. Psychometric properties of the Spanish validation of the Five Facets of Mind‌fulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Eur J Psychiat 2012; 26(2): 118-26.
48. Ahmadvand Z, Heydarinasab L, Shairi MR. Checking Validity and Reliability of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in Iranian Non-Clinical Samples. J Behav Sci 2013; 3(7): 229-38. [in Persian]
49. Tamannaei Far S, Asghar Nezhad Farid AA, Mirzaei M, Soleimani M. Psychometric properties of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFM‌Q).‌ J Develop Psychol (Iranian Psychologists) 2016; 47(12): 321-9. [in Persian]
50. Baroni D, Nerini A, Matera C, Stefanile C. Mindfulness and emotional distress: The mediating role of psychological well-being. J Curr Psychol 2018; 37(3): 467-76.
51. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depr‌ession Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. J Behav Res Therapy 1995; 33(3): 335-43.
52. Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxi‌ety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a comm‌unity sample. J Psychol Assess 1998; 10(2): 176-81.
53. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. London: Sage Publications; 1993.
54. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS‐21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. British J Clin Psyc‌hol 2005; 44(2): 227-39.
55. Sahebi A, Asghari MJ, Salari RS. Validation of depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21) for an Iranian population. J Iran Psychol 2005; 1(4): 299-313.
56. Asghari Moghaddam MA, Sa’ed F, Dibaj Nia P, Zangeneh J. Preliminary evaluation of validity and reliability of depression, anxiety and stress (DASS) scales in non-clinical samples. Daneshvar e Raftar 2008; 38: 23-31. [in Persian]
57. Pedhazur EJ, Schmelkin LP. Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Lon‌don: Psychology Press; 2013.
58. Abareshi A, Hossieni SY. Structural equation modeling. Tehran: Jame’e Shenasan; 2012. [in Persian]
59. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education; 2007.
60. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Convent‌io‌nal criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary J 1999; 6(1): 1-55.
61. Mulaik SA, James LR, Van Alstine J, Bennett N, Lind S, Stilwell CD. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol Bull 1989; 105(3): 430-45.
62. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51(6): 1173-82.
63. Ridner SH. Psychological distress: concept analysis. J Advanc Nurs 2004; 45(5): 536-45.
64. Pearlin LI. The family as a context of the stress process. In Kasl SV, & Cooper CL (Eds). Stress and health: Issues in Research methodology. New York: Wiley; 1987.
65. Pepping CA, Davis PJ, O’Donovan A. The association between state attachment security and state mindfulness. Plos One 2015; 10(3): e0116779.
66. Santrock JW. Life-Span Develpment. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
67. Kabat‐Zinn J. Mindfulness‐based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical psyc‌hology: J Sci pract 2003; 10(2): 144-56.
68. Didonna F. Clinical Handbook of Mindfulness. London: Springer; 2008.
69. English L. Investigating childhood emotional maltreatment, adult attachment, and mindfulness as predictors of internalizing symptoms and emotional processing [Doctoral Dissertation]. Ontario: Univ‌er‌sity of Guelph; 2012. 176p.
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله
نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:

CAPTCHA


XML   English Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Akhavan-Abiri F, Shairi M R, Gholami Fesharaki M. The relationship between attachment and psychological distress with regard to the mediating role of mindfulness. Feyz 2019; 23 (1) :89-101
URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3691-fa.html

اخوان عبیری فاطمه، شعیری محمدرضا، غلامی فشارکی محمد. رابطه سبک دلبستگی و پریشانی روان شناختی باتوجه به نقش واسطه ای ذهن آگاهی. مجله علوم پزشکی فيض. 1398; 23 (1) :89-101

URL: http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-3691-fa.html



Creative Commons License
This open access journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ۴.۰ International License. CC BY-NC ۴. Design and publishing by Kashan University of Medical Sciences.
Copyright ۲۰۲۳© Feyz Medical Sciences Journal. All rights reserved.
دوره 23، شماره 1 - ( دوماه نامه 1398 ) برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
مجله علوم پزشکی فیض Feyz Medical Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 46 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645